Khushi @ Arfeena v. Commissioner of Police & Ors

ORDER oh

21.10.2011 Respondent No. 3, father of Petitioner is present in the Court and he states that the Petitioner is a major, he has no objection to her marriage and he has not lodged any complaint against the Petitioner. He also state that he will not interfere in the huppy married life of the Petitioner. In view of the statement of the Respondent No. 3, the Petitioner who is present in person, does not wish to press the present petition. Petition and application are dismissed as not pressed. Order dasti. WM- /MUKTA GUPTA, J. ocToBER 21, 2011 tvn' Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

41# $- *INTHEHIGHcoURToFDELHIATNEwDELHI + w.P.(cRL) 93112011 & crl. M.A. NO. 783 Ll20I1 (interim relief) KHUSHI @ ARFEENA ..... Petitioner Through: Vk. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate' VETSUS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ""' Itespondents Through: Mr. Fiarsh Prabhakar, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Radhey ShYam. Respondent No. 3 in Person' CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA