- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 28 June 2013
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 997/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vibhu Bakhru
Judgment
$-23
28.06.2013 W.P. (Crl.) 997/2013 Present: Mr K.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Ms Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate for GNCTD. Crl. M.A. 9545/2013 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (Crl.) 997/2013 This is a petition wherein the petitioners have alleged that they are being harassed by certain family members of the petitioner no. 1 sinceshe being a widow, has been remarried and is currently livingwith petitioner no. 2 who is her husband. The petitioner has sought police protection against the petitioner no. 1 being forcibly taken from Delhi by her other relatives. In this regard, we direct that SHO, PS Vijay Vihar would take appropriate steps to ensure that the petitioners are not harassed by the family members of the petitioner no. 1. The petitioners may directlyapproach the SHO PS VijayVihar and provide the details. If he deem necessary,he may provide police protection to the petitioners. Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. The petitioner seelcs to withdraw the present writ petition with the Hberty to challenge any FIR that may be lodged in Dehradun. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in accordance with the above observations and with the aforesaid liberty. Dasti under the signatures of Court Master. (VIBHU BAKHRU) VACATION JUDGE JUNE 28, 2013 rk
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.