VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Kanika Mittal v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 June 2013
Bench
Sanjeev Sachdev Aauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 4000/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjeev Sachdev A

Judgment

ORDER

21.06.2013 CM No. 7450/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4000/2013 & C.M.No.7449/2013 (for ex-parte ad interim relieD By the present petition, the petitioner has sought direction to the respondent to consider the representation dated 8.3.2013 to allow the petitioner to participate in the recruitment/examination process against the registration application no.150 198 for post code 70/90 invited vide advertisement no.004/2009. The respondent has placed on record an order of the Deputy Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi dated 20.6.2013 to show that necessary action has been taken to enlist the name of the· petitioner in the eligible list. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. . / • In view of this, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. No order is called for. The petition is disposed of. JUNE 21, 2013 rb

SjEEV SACHDEV A, J. (VACATION JUDGE)

Case details

Parties and counsel

•-· ), • * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4000/2013 o/o KANIKA MITTAL ..... Petitioner . Through: Mr.Sandeep Jindal, Advocate versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Pulkit Aggarwal, proxy counsel for Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate CORAM: . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEV A

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.