VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Arcelormittal Nippon Steel India Pvt Ltd v. Mideast Integrated Steel Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2025
Bench
Subramonium Prasadauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 932/2025

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Subramonium Prasad

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2025

¶1The present petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶2Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constituted by this Court on 23.02.2022. The last of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended by this Court till 29.11.2025. The present petition has been filed for further extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶3It is stated that final arguments are being advanced before the Arbitrator.

¶4In view of the facts of the present case, this Court is inclined to extend This is a digitally signed order. the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal from 29.11.2025 till 31.05.2026, so that the award can be pronounced.

¶5The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J NOVEMBER 11, 2025 S. Zakir

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 932/2025 ARCELORMITTAL NIPPON STEEL INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anannya Ghosh, Ms. Doel Bose, Ms. Kashish Chhabra and Mr. Sirjesh Kumar Singh, Advs. versus MIDEAST INTEGRATED STEEL LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta with Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav and Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.