VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

B K Kalra v. Punjab National Bank & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 July 2013
Bench
Manmohan Singhauthor
Case no.
CM(M) 649/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan Singh

Judgment

ORDER %

02.07.2013 The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to various orders passed in the matter. It appears from the orders that there is delay on one pretext or the other in the further proceedings on behalf of respondent No.l. I have been informed by the counsel that the next dated of hearing is fixed on 2"'' August, 2013. It is not in disputethat the respondentNo.l already filed the affidavits of main witnesses in support of its case. Though in the impugned order while dismissing the petitioner's application the learned trial court has given reasons in paras 12 to 14 but considering the overall facts and circumstances, it is expected that the trial court would expedite the matter and recordthe evidencein the matter on 2^^ August, 2013 which is stated to be listed for plaintiffs evidence. With these directions, both petitions are disposed of Copy of the order be sent to the respondents by the Registry. siNG&VT- ^ JULY 02, 2013/jk

Case details

Parties and counsel

r $--37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 648/2013 B K KALRA Petitioner Through Mr.Mukesh Anand, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR Through None. + CM(M) 649/2013 BK KALRA Respondents ... Petitioner Through Mr.Mukesh Anand, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR Through None. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.