VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Punam v. University of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
30 May 2013
Bench
G.S.Sistaniauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 3603/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow G.S.Sistani

Judgment

ORDER

30.05.2013 Petitioner was admitted to the University of Delhi (School of pet,t,onerhas yet not completedher course as she remainedabsent in TesTH within the Pescnbed span period. The petitionerthereafterapplied for ase^a' chance to the Universityon 4.4.2013 but the same was denied as the cha -^"demic Council decided that no special Chancew,i, be givento the studentswho haveta.enadmissionbeforethe MnRupai who entersappearanceon advancecopy submitsthatthe un,vers,tyof Deihi has adopted a uniform policy and the case of the petitionerwas consideredin the meetingofthe StandingCommitteeofthe ^ cademicCouncil held on 23.04.2013. The meeting was attendedto by JtecedTrelord'' I'®®" Heard learned counselfor the parties.The Universityhas taken a uni^rmdecisionnot to grantaspecialchanceto studentsLmittrdto. eave the decisionregardingacademicmattersto experts,who are more familiarwith the problemstheyface than the courts The Hon'bieSupremeCourtwhilefp|lowlngits earlierdecisionofthe / % Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. > STrhrh'm'' AIR 1965 8sec 546 that normallyit is wise and safe for the Courtsto leave the dea lon of academicmattersto expertswho are more familiarwith the Pobiemstheyfacethan the courtsgenerallyare".Asimilarview has been xpressed ,n several decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the ma ers of Dr. Uma Kant vs. Dr. Bhika Lai JainJT 1991 (4) SO 75 (para 9), SC^SSr^ Dean, B. j. MedicalCollege&Ors.JT 1992(1) Tol l r f "^ Board Of Education vs. Feyaz Ahmed Malik &Ors (2000) 3SCC 59 ' aT^iZ (200 8see 4?7 < ^0^=- ^^(1999^ ^ -• 0^ ^-jab. is nn '^y U"-®rsitythere IS no groundto entertainthe presentwritpetition. The writ petitionis accordinglydismissed. MAY 30, 2013 i — G-S.SISTANI,J. dk MP.fp 3603/2013

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-37 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)3603/2013 i PUNAM I Through:Mr.RavinderNarwal,Adv. versus UNIVERSITYOF DELHI Through:Mr.M.J.S.Rupal,Adv. Respondent CORAM: ^ HON'BLEMR. JUSTICEG.S.SISTANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.