Manish Aggarwal Prop. of Manish Industries v. State & Ors

#13

26.10.2010 Present: Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kunal Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the State. None for respondents No.2 to 9. +Crl,M.C.1776/2010 & Crl.M.A.No.6889/2010(for directions) Petitioner, vide instant petition, is seel<ing direction to learned Trial ' Judgeto decide the complaintexpeditiouslywithin a stipulated time frame. <• On 30^^ July 2010, a direction was issued to the concerned Magistrate to ensure that cross examination of complainant is concluded on the date fixed. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms that cross examination of the complainant has been concluded and the complainant has closed his evidence on 4^^ October 2010 and the case is now listed for recording of the statement of accused. ^ Taking into account the aforesaidfactors, it is expected that learned Magistrate shall try to dispose of the matter preferably within six months. The petition as well as pending applications stand disposed. OCTOBER 26, 2010 ks (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.