- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Navin Chawla, Shalinder Kaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 15669/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Navin ChawlaFollow Shalinder Kaur
Judgment
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
¶1This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the respondents to conduct an additional Court of Inquiry (COI) into the incident dated 09.12.2019, wherein the son of the petitioner unfortunately lost his life. The petitioner further prays for an appropriate action to be taken based on the additional COI that ought to be conducted by the respondents.
¶2Having considered the nature of the prayer made and the allegations made in the petition, and without making any comment on the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents on the
W.P.(C) 15669/2024
territorial jurisdiction, we are of the opinion that the respondents should consider the present petition as a representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from today, communicating its decision to the petitioner. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the said decision, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.
¶3We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and the same shall be considered by the competent authority independently in accordance with the law.
¶4With the above observations and directions, the petition is disposed of.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024/rv/DG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P.(C) 15669/2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 11.11.2024 + W.P.(C) 15669/2024 M BALAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Ashok Kr. Kashyap, SPC with Mr.Kabir Kr. Hazarika, GP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.