Bhupender @ Pushpender v. State of NCT of Delhi

ORDER f %

28.05.2013

¶1It is urged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the co-accused Kusum, the Petitioner's sister has already been granted bail by the learned • Additional Sessions Judge by an order dated 07.05.2013.

¶2It is urged that even if the allegations made in the FIR are taken on the face value then no offence of attempt of rape would be made out and at the most it would be only an offence under Section 354-A IPG. It is urged that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case.

¶3I have gone through the police file produced by the 10. The Petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2013.

¶4Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the Petitioner is directed to be admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ?25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

¶5Copy of the order be sent to the Trial Court.

¶6The Application is allowed in above terms.

¶7Dasti.

G.P. MITTAL, J. MAY 28, 2013 vk J Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 856/2013 BHUPENDER @ PUSHPENDER Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Mukand, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: SI Narendra Singh, PS Gajipur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL