Brijesh Kumar v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)

ORDER %

28.05.2013

¶1The Petitionerwas convictedfor the offence punishableunder Section 376 (2) (g) IPG and was sentencedto undergo RI for a period of ten years: The Petitionerhas alreadyundergoneimprisonmentfor eightyears and sevenmonthsincludingthe remissionearnedby him

¶2The Petitionerseeks parole for two months in order to look after his ailing mother and re-establishsocial ties. The Petitioner'srequest for gi'ant of parole was rejectedin view of the fact that the Petitionerwas involvedin a heinous crime. Keeping in view the fact the Petitioneris going to completehis sentencein another VA years, the prayerfor grant of parole is allowed.

¶3The Petitioneris grantedparolefor a periodoffour weeks from the date of his release, subjectto his furnishinga personal bond in the sum of ?10,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfactionof the Superintendent Jail.

¶4The Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶5A copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendentfor information.

¶6Dasti.

G.P. MITTAL, J. MAY 28, 2013/vk

$—15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 820/2013 BRIJESH KUMAR Petitioner Through: Nemo. Versus. STATE(G.N.C.T.OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL