VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Sardar Surinder Singh v. Paramjit Singh Sarna & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 October 2011
Bench
Hima Kohliauthor
Case no.
CONT.CAS(C) 363/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Hima Kohli

Judgment

ORDER o/o

21.10.2011

¶1Counsel for the respondents states that for the purpose of complianceof the order dated 14.9.2010passed by the learned Single Judge, in WP(C) No.13038/2005 and connected matters, he has brought three cheques for a total sum of ^2,00,000/-payable to the petitioner and his wife in the following manner: Sr. Cheque Dated In favour of Amount Drawn on No. No. 129199

18.10.2011 BalwinderKaur ?75,000/- PunjabSiSind Bank

¶1129200

18.10.2011 Surinder Singh ?75,000/- Punjab8<.Sind Bank ii. 129201

18.10.2011 Surinder Singh ?50,000/- PunjabS.Sind Bank

¶2The petitioner and his wife are the employees of respondent No.2/school being run by the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management CONT.CAS(C) 363/2011 2 of2. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Committee. Counsel for the respondents states that in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties as recorded in the order dated 14.09.2010, they had agreed that if the respondents would pay the entire amount of ?2,00,000/- to the petitioner and his wife, the petitioner would tender his resignation. It is further stated that pursuant to the aforesaid settlement, the wife of the petitioner, namely, Balwinder Kaur has been issued a fresh posting order under intimation to her.

¶3Counsel for the petitioner confirms the aforesaid position. He states that now that the respondents have handed over cheques for a total sum of ?2,00,000/-, the petitioner shall submit his resignation to the respondent within three days. He further states that nothing further survives in the present contempt petition.

¶4In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. HIMA KOHLI,J OCTOBER 21, 2011 'anb' CONT.CAS(C) 363/2011 2 of2.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 363/2011 SARDAR SURINDER SINGH Petitioner Througin: l^r. J.S. Lamba, Adv. versus PARAIVIJITSINGH SARNA & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Chabrra, Adv. with Mr.Raj Kamal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.