Ved Prakash v. Maman

ORDER

25.10.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not pressing the present petition on merits and is ready to vacate the premises in question of which vacation order has been passed against him after two years from 04.08.2010. The respondent has agreed to give the said time to the petitioner. \ The undertaking in this regard is filed by the petitioner. The same is taken on record. The petitionershall pay the rent/use and occupation charges regularly. The respondent will not execute the eviction order till 04.08.2012. The petition stands disposed of in terms of statement of o/o parties as well as undertaking given by the petitioner. n / Wt7-ocToBER 25,20LO srb VEENA BIRFALJ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

53. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 136/2010 VED PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar, Adv. VCTSUS ..... Respondent MAMAN b Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL