- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 21 October 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 646/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER u/o
21.10.2011 Itcspondent Nos. 3 and 4 are present in the Court and they state that thc petitioner No. 1 is major and since she has married Petitioner No. 2 of her own free will, they have not lodged any complaint and they will not interfere in the huppy married life of the Petitioners. In view of the statement of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, the Petitioners who are present in Court, do not wish to press the present petition. petition and application are dismissed as not pressed. Order dasti. ocToBER 2L, 20lr tvnt flr1,rffiW,L- ' MUKTA GUPTA, J. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
36#$- *INTHEHIGHCOURToFDELHIATNEwDELHI + w.P.(cRL) 64612011 & crl. M.A. No. 5548 lz}tI (interim relief) JYOTI & ANR ""' Petitioners Through:Mr.PradeepKuamr,Advocatewith Petitioner in Person VETSUS STATE & ORS ""' ResPondents Through: Mr. Amit Singh Rathore, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in Person' CORAM: trION'BLT] MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.