VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2009 › High Court of Delhi

Bougal Ram v. UOI

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 September 2009
Bench
Sanjiv Khannaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 3352/2008

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjiv Khanna

Judgment

O R D E R % 18.09.2009

¶1Learned counsel for the respondent has filed status report today in response to queries raised vide order dated 25th May, 2009. In response to query No. 3 whether the petitioner was given training at Sarahan, Tehsil Rampur Bushar, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, the respondents have admitted that SSB had imparted training to one Mr. Bogal Ram son of Mangu Ram, resident of Village Sangar, Post Office Parmundal, Police Station Vijaypur, Tehsil Samba, District Jammu (J&K) during the period 3rd March, 1986 to 5th April, 1986. The name and residential address of the petitioner is the same, but as per the petitioner his father's name is Mangali Ram and not Mangu Ram. The petitioner, it is apparent is the same person, who had undergone the said training. The fact that the petitioner was arrested in Pakistan on 24th July, 1992 and had remained there under detention till 2000 is also admitted. As per the enquiries WPC No.3352-2008 Page 2

made by the respondents, the petitioner had made several trips to Pakistan and had gone to Lahore, Sialkot, Gujranwala,Faislabad, etc.

¶2In this connection, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to orders passed in the case of Balwan Singh versus Union of India, CWP No. 6543/2001 and High Court of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No. 12239/2007 titled Mayadevi Nanakchand Yadav versus Union of India and Others .

¶3In view of the peculiar facts of the present case and the report now filed by the respondents, it is directed that the respondents will pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner within five weeks. On the said payment being made, no further proceedings and claim will be entertained from the petitioner.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

SEPTEMBER 18, 2009

VKR

Case details

Parties and counsel

WPC No.3352-2008 Page 1 11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3352/2008 BOUGAL RAM ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sushant Sharma, Advocate. versus UOI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Puneet Khurana, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.