- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2025
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manoj Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 2917/2025
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vivek ChaudharyFollow Manoj Jain
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2025
¶1The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent to produce the minor girl child before this Court. Learned Standing Counsel for State submits that the missing girl stands traced.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the missing girl stands traced and the petitioner has already met her.
¶4In the given circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to take any other appropriate steps as may be required in the given circumstances.
¶5Permission and liberty, as prayed for, is granted in accordance with law. This is a digitally signed order. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J MANOJ JAIN, J NOVEMBER 10, 2025/r/nc This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2917/2025 SHEELA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mr. Sanjay Lao, St. Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Insp. Jagmohan, SI Anand Swaroop, PS Sarai Rohilla. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.