VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Jitender Kumar & Ors v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 November 2011
Bench
V.K. Shaliauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1596/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow V.K. Shali

Judgment

ORDER o2.LL.2oLt This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 57/2007 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered by P.S. Karawal Nagar, Delhi in respect of which the charge sheet has been filed. The ground for quashing of the FIR is that the petitioner No. 1 and the respondent no. 2 have settled all their matrimonial disputes as a consequence of which they have also been . divorced by the competent Court. The learned counsel for the petitioners further stated that an amount of Rs.L,tt,O}O/- have already been paid to the respondent no.2 towards the full and final settlement of her entire claim. The petition is supported by the o/o

¶1fi Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

¶2@ affidavits of all the 16 petitioners. although only petitioner no. l/husband of the respondent no. 2 is present in Court. The petitioner no.1 is duly identified by his counsel and the respondent no. 2 is duly identified by the IO. She has also filed an affidavit supporting the averments made in the petition and on oral inquiry she has stated that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed as they have been divorced by the competent Court. She has also admitted that she has received an amount of Rs.1,11,000/- towards the full and final settlement of her entire claim. The learned APP does not have any objection to the quashing of the FIR. Having regard to the aforesaid facts of the case that the parties rh.\ . have settled all their matrimonial disputes and^have also been divorced by the Competent Court, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the aforesaid FIR and the consequent charge sheet pending. Accordingly, FIR No. 57/2007 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered by P.S. Karawal Nagar, Delhi and the consequent charged sheet are quashed. , v.K. sHALr, J NOVEMBER 02, 2O11 s .

Case details

Parties and counsel

r, ( $-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI cRL.M.C. 1s96/20LL JITENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:Mr. R. K. Jain, Adv. VETSUS STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through:Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.