- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Sachin Datta
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 322/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sachin Datta
Judgment
O R D E R
¶1The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "the A&C Act") seeks certain interim orders on account of disputes between the parties under a Franchise Agreement dated 22.06.2023 (hereinafter "the Agreement").
¶2It is averred in the petition that the petitioner is engaged in the business of operating highly specialised convenience retail stores under the brand name of "The New Shop" catering to the hyperlocal needs of the customers, both offline and online, for which the petitioner has devised a franchising/licensing mechanism.
¶3The Agreement dated 22.06.2023 was executed between the petitioner and the respondent. The petition has been filed on the averment that the respondents have not paid the requisite monthly royalty payable to the petitioner under the Agreement. Further, it is stated that the respondents have opened a competing store in the same line of business, taking This is a digitally signed order. advantage of the intellectual property and the benefits derived by the respondents under the Agreement with the petitioner.
¶4Learned counsel for the respondent, who has entered appearance, categorically states on instructions, that the respondents are not presently engaged in operating any store at all, either directly or indirectly, and are not engaged in any competing business. The said statement is taken on record.
¶5In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition. However, the petitioner reserves the liberty to initiate arbitral proceedings for claiming appropriate relief/s against the respondents.
¶6Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/at This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 322/2024 ACCELERATE PRODUCTX VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Humraz Bir Singh and Mr. Aadyasha Mohanty, Advs. versus C AND S ENTERPRISE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanchit Gupta, Adv. (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 07.11.2024
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.