- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Prateek Jalan
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 12902/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Prateek Jalan
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2024 CM APPL. 65750/2024 (for direction) & W.P.(C) 12902/2024
¶1The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is directed against a No Objection Certificate ["NOC"] dated 19.06.2024, by which the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ["MCD"] has granted a NOC for installation of a lift and connecting bridge in DDA Flat Nos. 192 to 194, Block – B, Sheikh Sarai, Phase – I, New Delhi ["subject property"].
¶2The petitioner is the resident of Flat Nos. 192 & 193 at subject property.
¶3The proceedings have been listed today for consideration of an This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 12902/2024 application filed by the writ petitioner. However, in the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty approach the Appellate Tribunal for the MCD ["ATMCD"] to challenge the impugned NOC. This request is made in light of the order of this Court in Sudha Ramanathan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and Anr. [order dated 08.12.2023 in W.P.
(C) 15788/2023].
¶4Having regard to the above, the writ petition is taken on Board, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, and is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. All pending applications also stand dismissed.
¶5The petitioner may seek the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in the proposed appeal, which the ATMCD is requested to consider in accordance with law.
¶6The next date of hearing i.e. 31.01.2025 stands cancelled.
¶7All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved for consideration in appropriate proceedings. PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024 'Bhupi'/ This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P.(C) 12902/2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12902/2024 SAMARTH SAXENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Thakur Sumit, Mr. Gaurav P., Mr. Afaque, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Mr. Nitish Dubey, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Ishaan S. Sharma, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Aditya Raj, Mr. Pratham Diwakar, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.