Limitation Act, 1963
68 Supreme Court judgments considering this law. Search within these.
-
Vikram Bhalchandra Ghongade v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Whether the executing Court erred in dismissing the execution petition as not maintainable; whether the decree passed by the first appellate Court having been passed in an appeal, where both the appellants had expired prior to…
-
Lifestyle Equities C.V. & Anr. v. Amazon Technologies INC.
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order by which the application filed by the respondent herein (judgment debtor-original defendant) under Order XLI Rule 5(1)…
-
Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi and Others v. Syeda Arifa Parveen
Whether the impugned judgments suffer from perversity and misreading of evidence, warranting re-appreciation of evidence under Article 136 of the Constitution of India; whether the High Court is correct in reversing the finding…
-
Shanti Devi (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. Goran v. Jagan Devi & Ors.
Whether the plaintiff’s suit was time-barred or not. Whether it is Article 65 or Article 59 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, which would apply to the present facts in hand.
-
Seventh Day Adventist Senior Secondary School v. Ismat Ahmed and Others
Whether applications filed u/ss.7(1) and (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 by the tenant without deposit of rent after lapse of statutory period of thirty days, along with an application u/s.5 of the Limitation…
-
Odisha State Financial Corporation v. Vigyan Chemical Industries and Others
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant u/Art.227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the civil proceedings and the orders passed by the Courts below regarding the computation of interest on the…
-
Development Authority v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers
The core issue in the present matter revolves around determining the appropriate forum for the adjudication of disputes arising out of the Concession Agreement dated 05.01.2012 entered into between the appellant and respondent…
-
Il & Fs Financial Services Limited v. Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Private Limited
Whether the Tribunals below were justified in holding that the s.7 application under the IBC filed by the appellant on 15.01.2024 was barred by time; does the entry in the Balance Sheet of F.Y. 2019-20 constitute a valid…
-
M/S Sonali Power Equipments Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Mumbai & Ors.
(i) Whether the Limitation Act applies to conciliation proceedings u/s.18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), and even if not, whether time-barred debts can be referred to conciliation;…
-
Smt. Arifa & Ors. v. Abhiman Apartment Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the liberty granted to file a fresh suit by the High Court would enable the party to revive a cause of action and save limitation, so as to enable raking up all grounds earlier raised and rejected by…
-
Thirunagalingam v. Lingeswaran & Anr.
An appeal suit along with the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days was preferred. The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days. Whether the delay is to be condoned or not, and if the…
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the appeal…
-
Santosh Devi v. Sunder
Whether the High Court rightly dismissed the second appeal filed by the petitioner herein (plaintiff) affirming the judgment passed by the First Appellate Court which had upheld the decree passed by the trial court dismissing the…
-
P. Kumarakurubaran v. P. Narayanan & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the plaint filed by the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the ground that the suit was barred by limitation.
-
Filomena Saldanha Through Power of Attorney Mr. Frazier Saldanha v. Sunil Kohli Represented by His Power of Attorney, Mr. Naval Bowry, & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the orders passed by the High Court allowing the Application for Speaking to Minutes and dismissing the review petition.
-
Rajeev Gupta & Ors. v. Prashant Garg & Ors.
Issue arose whether the suit was barred by limitation; whether the sale deeds were void documents; whether the Will stood admitted in the previous suits and was no longer required to be proved; whether the First Appellate Court…
-
Kanchhu v. Prakash Chand & Ors.
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court allowing writ petition u/Art.227 of the Constitution and allowing multiple interlocutory applications-application for condonation of delay in filing recall…
-
Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Whether service of a Section 21 notice and joinder in a Section 11 application are prerequisites to implead a person/entity as a party to the arbitral proceedings; What is the source of jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal over a…
-
Jharkhand Urja Utpadan Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The High Court rejected the Interim Application No. 11269 of 2024 filed by the petitioner herein u/s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and thereby declined to condone the delay of 301 days in filing the main appeal u/s.13(1-A) of the…
-
R. Nagaraj (Dead) through LRs. and Another v. Rajmani and Others
Whether the High Court was justified in remanding the matter to the trial Court for a fresh trial on the issue of limitation, despite the existence of concurrent findings, when section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908…
-
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Gopu & Anr.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court enhancing the compensation awarded to the claimants under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
-
A. Rajendra v. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order or from the date when the order is communicated to the parties.
-
M/S R. K. Transport Company v. M/S Bharat Aluminum Company Ltd. (Balco)
Matter pertains to the applicability of s.12 of the Limitation Act to proceedings u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; and whether the application filed by the respondent u/s.34 was barred by limitation.
-
New Mangalore Port Trust & Anr. v. Clifford D Souza Etc. Etc.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing writ petitions by the appellants challenging the order passed by the District Judge quashing the order of the Estate Officer raising demand…
-
Inder Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
-
Ram Lal v. Jarnail Singh (Now Deceased) through its LRs & Ors.
Suit filed by appellant seeking specific performance of contract based on an agreement of sale executed by respondents was allowed on 20-01-2012 and appellant was directed to deposit the balance sale consideration within two…
-
Om Prakash Gupta Alias Lalloowa (Now Deceased) & Ors. v. Satish Chandra (Now Deceased)
The issues before the Hon’ble Court were as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and could the second appeal be regarded as…
-
Singh and Others v. Harpal Singh Alias Harpal Singh Chela and
A suit for confirmation of possession or in the alternative recovery of possession and injunction was filed by the predecessor in interest of the Respondents against the predecessor in interest of the Appellants. The suit was…
-
Balbir Singh & Anr. Etc. v. Baldev Singh (D) Through His Lrs. & Ors. Etc.
The two questions of law fall for consideration in the instant appeal; First, the effect of merger of the trial court’s decree with that of the decree passed by High Court in second appeals; Secondly, whether the…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to s.34 of the…
-
NBCC (India) Ltd. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Whether an MSME cannot make a reference to the Facilitation Council for dispute resolution under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 if it is not registered under Section 8 of the 2006 Act…
-
The State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Pam Developments Private Limited & Anr.
Whether an amendment to a plaint introducing a fresh cause of action can be allowed if it arises out of continuous transactions and does not alter the nature and character of the suit; whether the bar under Section 80 of the CPC…
-
State of Uttar Pradesh and Another v. R.K. Pandey and Another
Matter pertains to the enforceability of the ex-parte awards against the employer-State Government and the principal of the medical college, when the employer objected the authenticity of the arbitration agreement relied on by…
-
Indian Evangelical Lutheran Church Trust Association v. Sri Bala & Co.
Whether the plaint in the subsequent suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff, i.e., O.S. No. 49/2007, is liable to be rejected in terms of Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the ground that…
-
Construction v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether the time for filing an application under Section 17, Arbitration Act, 1940 commences when the party seeking to challenge the award receives a formal notice of the making of the award, or from the date such party is aware…
-
Dwarika Prasad (D) Thr. LRs. v. Prithvi Raj Singh
Whether a separate application for condonation of delay is mandatory in cases where sufficient justification was provided while seeking restoration against ex-parte decree.
-
Mallavva and Anr v. Kalsammanavara Kalamma (Since Dead) by Legal Heirs & Ors.
Whether the original suit filed by the plaintiffs even after the amendment of the plaint at the stage of first appeal seeking possession of the suit property could be said to be time barred. In other words, whether the suit would…
-
Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust and Ors. v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan
Whether the High Court erred in affirming the order of the trial Court dismissing the application filed by the appellants under Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of plaint being barred by…
-
Daliben Valjibhai & Ors. v. Prajapati Kodarbhai Kachrabhai & Anr.
Whether a suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed, filed within three years from the date of knowledge as alleged in the plaint, can be dismissed at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure,…
-
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramkumar Choudhary
Appellant-State challenged the High Court judgment dismissing the second appeal filed with an inordinate delay of 5 years holding that the delay was not explained satisfactorily.