Ranjeet Singh @ Phool Singh & Ors v. State

ORDER «/o

24.05.2013 The state has verified the fact of the marriage and it is stated beforeme thatthe marriagewas solemnisedon 21.03.2013,on the basis of bone ossificationcertificateissued by Mittal's Diagnostic Centre whereinitis certifiedthatthe age ofpetitionerNo.2 is between17 to 19 years. ThepetitionerNo.2 is presentintheCourt. Thepetitionersdo not have any apprehensionor threatto their lives and it has been so stated before me by them. The petitionersalso have prayed for quashingof the FIR. The Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. learned additional standingcounsel for the State has filed a copy of the statement dated 16.02.2013 under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. given by petitionerNo.2 wherein she has statedthat she marriedpetitionerNo.l out of her own free will and left the parentalhouse at her ownwill. The complainantis also presentin the Courtand affirmsthe statement. In the light of this statement nothing survives and accordinglythe FIR is quashedand the writpetitionisallowedinthoseterms. R.V.EASWAR, J MAY 24, 2013 hs

1?^ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 586/2013 RANJEET SINGH@ PHOOLSINGH AND ORS. Petitioner Through: Mr. S. N. Bhagat,Advocate. versus STATENCT OFDELHI Respondent Through: Ms. ManviPriya,Proxyfor Dayan Krishnan, ASC with ASI Gurjant Singh,P.S. K.N. KatjuMarg. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR