Ombati Gupta v. DDA

ANIL KUMAR, J. *

Learned counsel for the respondent states, on instructions, that the request of the petitioner for allotment of a LIG flat under wrong address policy has been examined by the competent authority and the same has been acceded to by the competent authority. Learned counsel states that an appropriate letter dated 8th July, 2009 has been issued to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, contends that the letter dated 8th July, 2009 has been received from DDA intimating the petitioner that a LIG flat under wrong address policy shall be W.P.(C.) No.7794/2009

allotted to the petitioner by holding a computerized draw shortly and the result of the same will be communicated to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that a computerized draw has already been held.

Consequently, the respondent is directed to issue demand-cum-allotment letter to the petitioner for the LIG flat which is to be allotted to the petitioner under the wrong address policy within six weeks. On receipt of the demand-cum-allotment letter and on petitioner depositing the amount demanded within the time stipulated in the demand-cum-allotment letter, the respondent shall get the formalities completed and handover the possession within four weeks thereafter.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondent should issue the demand-cum-allotment letter for the LIG flat which has been drawn in favour of petitioner within six weeks. The consideration for the LIG flat be paid by the petitioner within the time stipulated in the demand-cum-allotment letter. On payment of demand-cum-allotment letter and completion of formalities within four weeks, thereafter, the possession of the flat be handed over to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of in terms hereof. Parties are left to bear their own costs.

September 10, 2009

ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'

W.P.(C.) No.7794/2009 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C.) No.7794/2009 % Date of Decision: 10.09.2009 Smt.Ombati Gupta …. Petitioner Through Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate Versus Delhi Development Authority …. Respondent Through Ms.Manisha Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?