Siddharth Singh v. Registrar of Companies

r _) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 159/2011 SIDDHARTH SINGH Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Sharma, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies for Registrar of Companies. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN % 20.10.2011 The present petition has been filed under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 for restoration of petitioner-company. Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies appearing for respondent states that he has no objection to the name of the petitioner-company being restored provided petitioner-company files documentary evidence of change of situation of registered office as well as all pending statutory returns, i.e., Annual Returns and Balance Sheets and pays additional fee as prescribed under law. Keeping in view the fact that the Annual Returns and Balance Sheets have not been filed by the petitioner-company for a period of Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. nearly four years, Mr. V.N. Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner-company himself states that petitioner-company would pay additional costs of Z 50,000/- to respondent. Accordingly, upon payment of costs of T 5 0,000/- within a period of three weeks, the name of the petitioner-company shall stand restored and its status would be changed from inactive to active company. Petitioner-company is granted four weeks' time to file documentary evidence of change of situation of registered office as well as statutory documents, like Annual Returns and Balance Sheets for the outstanding period along with the prescribed fees in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, present petition and application stand disposed of. MAN OCTOBER 20, 2011 is I