- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 402/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER
04.11.2011 Learned APP for the State informs that the ossification test has been conducted and as per the ossification test the age of the Petitioner No. t has been opined to be above 18 years and below 20 years. In view of this fact the Respondent No. 5 is directed not to interfere in the huppy manied peaceful life of the Petitioners. Since the Petitioners are living in Greater Noida, no protection can be provided by the Delhi Police. In case the Petitioners live at Kapasera, Delhi they will get in touch with the SHO, PS Kapasera, give their address where they are residing, whereupon the SHO, PS Kapasera, will weigh the threat perception and ensure the protection of the Petitioners and in case any specific complaint is received take action thereon in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. w@ " MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER O4,ZOIL tvn' oh Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
A t 30# $- * IN TIIE I{IGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 40212011 & crl. M.A. No. 3593/2011 (Direction) ROSHNI & ANR. ."" Petitioners Through: Mr. Keshav Kaushik, Advocate with Petitioners in person. STATE VCTSUS ..... Respondent Through: - Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI Vijender, PS Kapasera. Dr. (Maj) J.C. Vashisth, Advocate for RespondentNo.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.