VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd v. Anu Atri & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 November 2016
Bench
J.R. Midhaauthor
Case no.
MAC.APP. 224/2008

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow J.R. Midha

Judgment

O R D E R %

02.11.2016

¶1Respondents No.1 to 5 are present in Court along with their counsel.

¶2The appellant has deposited Rs.6,28,582/- which is lying in fixed deposit with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. The Registrar General is directed to instruct UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch to discharge the FDR and disburse the amount to respondents No.1 to 5 in the following manner:

(i) UCO Bank shall release Rs.50,000/- to respondent No.1, Rs.50,000/- to respondent No.2, Rs.50,000/- to respondent No.3, Rs.1 lakh to respondent No.4 and Rs.1 lakh to respondent No.5 by transferring the said amounts to their savings banks accounts.

¶3The balance amount be kept in FDRs in the following manner:

¶4The monthly interest on the FDRs of the respondents shall be credited to their savings bank accounts.

¶5At the time of maturity, the fixed deposit amount shall be credited in the savings bank accounts of the beneficiaries.

¶6All the original FDRs shall be retained by UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. However, the photocopies of the same shall be provided to the respondents/beneficiaries.

¶7No cheque book or debit card be issued to the claimants/respondents without permission of this Court.

¶8No loan or advance or pre-mature discharge shall be permitted without the permission of this Court.

¶9The claimants/respondents shall approach the UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch for completing the formalities for the disbursement of the award amount in terms of this order.

¶10The UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch shall ensure that the savings bank account of respondents are individual savings bank accounts and not joint accounts.

¶11Respondents are at liberty to approach this Court for release of further amount in case of any financial exigency. Sr. No. Duration of FDR Resp. 1

(Wife) Amount in percentage Resp. 2 (Daughter) Amount in percentage Resp. 3 (Daughter) Amount in percentage

¶11 year 10% 10% 10%

¶22 years 10% 10% 10%

¶33 years 10% 5% 5%

¶44 years 10% --

¶55 years 10% - - TOTAL 50% 25% 25% GRAND TOTAL 100%

¶12This appeal was disposed of on 21st October, 2016 and need not be listed again.

¶13Copy of this order be given dasti to counsels for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

J.R. MIDHA, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2016 rsk

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 224/2008 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate versus ANU ATRI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.K. Bharti and Mr. J.N. Patel, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.