- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Tara Vitasta Ganju
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 271/2023
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Tara Vitasta Ganju
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2024 CM APPL. 65661/2024 [Seeking withdrawal of the present Petition]
¶1This is a joint Application filed by the parties seeking withdrawal of the present Petition. It is stated that in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.10.2024, all disputes inter se the parties have been settled.
¶2The Petitioner is physically present in Court today.
2.1 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/landlord submits that the possession of the subject premises has been received.
¶3Learned Counsel for the Respondent/tenant submits that he has just handed over the Demand Draft in the sum of Rs. 1 lakh to Mr. Ram Kishan Ranjan, authorised representative of the Respondent, who is physically present in Court today.
This is a digitally signed order. 3.1 Mr. Ranjan affirms the same and submits that he has received the said Demand Draft today.
¶4Accordingly, the Petition and all pending Applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
¶5The date already fixed, i.e., 05.12.2024, stands cancelled.
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 271/2023 & CM APPL. 65661/2024 MR. ANUP JINDAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Bansal, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus M/S THE HANDICRAFT EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION .....Respondent Through: Ms. Deep Dhamija, Adv. with Mr. Ram Kishan Ranja, AR of the Respondent in person and Mr. Chhatrapati Ranjit Rai, AR of the Respondent through VC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.