- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2010
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Bhat
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 409/2008
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Ravindra Bhat
Judgment
ORDER %
27.10.2010 LA. No. 14254/2010 (Under Order 23 Rule 3) This is a joint application by the parlies requesting the Couil to record the compromise arrived at by them. The terms of compromise are contained in paras 2A to 2G of the application. The application is accompanied by the affidavits of the plaintiff, as well as the defendants; the Compromise Deed is also enclosed with the application. Plaving considered the averments in the application and the documents on record, the Court is of the opinion that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes; interest of justice requires that the application should be allowed. LA. No. 14254/2010 is accordingly allowed. CS (OS) 409/2008 In view of the orders made today in LA. No. 14254/2010, the suit is decreed in terms of paras 2A to 2G of the compromise application. Let a decree in the above terms be drawn. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J OCTOBER 27,2010 'ajk' 3' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 409/2008 SH. ASHOK BANSAL ' Plaintiff Tlirough : Sh. U.K. Shandilya, Advocate. versus SH. S. INDERJEET SINGH & OTHERS Defendants TIrrough : Sh. M.G. Vacher, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.