- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Amit Bansal
- Case no.
- CS(COMM) 385/2019
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Amit Bansal
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2024
¶1The counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled the dispute in mediation proceedings before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre ['Mediation Centre'].
¶2The Settlement Agreement dated 9th September, 2024, [hereinafter the "Settlement Agreement"] has been placed on record and the same bears the signatures of the authorised representative of the plaintiff and the defendants.
¶3I have perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement and do not find anything unlawful therein.
¶4The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
¶5In view of the above, the present suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement, which shall form part of the decree.
¶6Let the decree sheet be drawn up. This is a digitally signed order. CS(COMM) 385/2019
¶7In view of the fact that the matter has been settled at the Mediation Centre, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
¶8All pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
CS(COMM) 385/2019 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 385/2019 & I.A. 10160/2019 VISHAL MONGA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Advocate. versus LAKSHAY SEHGAL & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Vivek Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.