- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 251/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016 Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no. 3 submits that remedy of revision is available to the petitioners against the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Sessions Judge by filing a revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. In case revision petition is filed within ten days from today, the same shall be entertained by the Sessions Judge without going into the question of limitation.
A.K. PATHAK, J. OCTOBER 26, 2016 rb
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 251/2015 BAPTIST CHURCH TRUST ASSOCIATION & ORS... Petitioners Through :Mr. Prag Chawla and Mr. Sachin Verma, Advs. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. & SI G.P. Pal, P.S. Civil Lines for the State Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Anand, Mr. K.K. Jha, Mr. Lakshay and Mr. Kartik, Advs. for respondent no. 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.