Mohan Singh v. Panna Lal

ORDER %

17.09.2009 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. He, however, submits that while disposing off the application under Order 39 Rule 2A, and the appeal the Courts below have made certain observations with regard to the title of the petitioner to the suit property. It is made clear that any observation made by the Courts below in these proceedings, with regard to the title of the petitioner, shall not come in the way of the petitioner in perusing the suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent in respect of the suit property. With these observations petition stands disposed of. All pending applications also stand disposed of. 4r,

VIPIN SANGHI, J. SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 vn Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 329/2007 & C.M. Nos. 341 2-341 3/2007 MOHAN SINGH Petitioner Through: Mr. J. C., Mahendroo, Advocate. versus PANNA LAL Respondent Through: Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI