- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 May 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan Singh
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 76/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan Singh
Judgment
ORDER %
24.05.2013 Lemned counsel for the respondent, upon instructions, states that the possession of the subject matter of the property is with the petitioner. He submits that the respondent has no objection if the some Advocate be appointed by this Court as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. As agreed, Mr.Gaurav Duggal, Advocate (Mob. No.981 1297368) who is also present in Court, is appointed as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate all the disputes and differences between the parties. The Arbitrator shall conduct the proceedings under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall give prior notice before commencing the proceedings. Total fee ofthelemned Arbitrator shall be payable to the tune which Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. shall be borne by both the. parties in equal proportion. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Copies of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties. A copy of the order be also communicated to the learned sole Arbitrator. J. MAY 24, 2013/jk uJ..>-!/ _ Olk
1.2 - \
Case details
Parties and counsel
/ $-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 76/2013 MOHIT SARDANA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Manish Bhasin, Adv. versus :,. SURYA HEALTHCARE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vishnu Anand, Adv. with Mr.Lokesh Bhola, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.