- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 November 2025
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1011/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
20.11.2025
¶1A Writ Petition under Article 226/227 Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of the FIR No.148/2017 under Section 323/376/506/377 IPC registered at Police Station Moti Nagar and Charges under Section 323/376 2(n)/506/377 IPC and its consequent proceedings.
¶2Learned ASC for State submits that the Charges have already been framed and the Prosecution evidence is being recorded.
¶3By way of the present Writ Petition only the Order on Charge has been challenged, which is essentially on merits.
¶4Considering that the matter is at the stage of Prosecution Evidence, the Petition is disposed of with liberty the Petitioner to raise the contentions This is a digitally signed order. before the learned Trial Court at an appropriate stage.
¶5The Petition stands disposed of along with the pending Applications.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. NOVEMBER 20, 2025/va This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1011/2024, CRL.M.A. 9599/2024, CRL.M.A. 12636-12637/2024, CRL.M.A. 38422-38423/2024 & CRL.M.A. 22620/2025. RAJEEV SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus STATE OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Amol Sinha (ASC Criminal for State) along with Adv. Kshitiz Garg, Adv. Ashvini Kumar, Adv. Nitish Dhawan, Adv. Chavi Lazarus, Adv. Manan Wadhwa and with SI Sushma Security Unit. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.