Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd v. Noida Cyber Park Pvt Ltd

ORDER % 3L05.2013 The petitionerhas filed the abovementionedpetition under Section 11(5) of the Aititrationand ConciliationAct, 1996 for appointmentof an arbitiator. Thoughthe petitionhasbeencontestedby the respondent,however,at the time of hearingof the petition,it is faii'ly agreedby the learnedcounsel for the respondent for appointment of independent sole ai'bitiator. He submits that some retii'ed ADJ be appointed as sole arbitrator. The suggestiongiven by the learnedcounselfor the respondentis acceptableto the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the parties are agi-eeable that Mr.Prem Kumar, retired ADJ, be appointed as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes including their claims and counter claims. As agreed, Mr.Prem Kumar, retired ADJ, Mob. 9873176030, R/o 68F, Pocket F, Alaknanda Gangotri Enclave, New Delhi, is appointed as Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. sole arbitratorto adjudicatethe disputesbetweenthe partiesincludingthen claims and counter-claims.The Arbitrator shall conduct the proceedings underthe provisionsofthe Arbitrationand ConciliationAct, 1996 and shall give prior notice before commencing the proceedings. The fees of the learnedArbitratorshall be payable accordingto the scheduleof fees fixed by DelhiHighCourtArbitrationCentreunderits rules. The petitionis accordinglydisposedof Copies of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties. Acopyofthe orderbe also sentto the learnedsole Arbiti'ator. MAY 31, 2013/jk

/ $—3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 40/2013 BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT LTD Petitioner Through Mi-.ArunKr. Veima, Adv. with Mr.Ashish Bansal, Adv. versus NOIDA CYBER PARK PVT LTD Respondent Through Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Udisha Sahay, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH