- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 August 2026
- Bench
- Girish Kathpalia
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2197/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Girish Kathpalia
Judgment
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
¶1Petitioner seeks quashing of Complaint Case No. 450/2022 of Police Station Kalyan Puri, Delhi for offence under Section 354/354A/354D/341 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioner.
¶2State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.
¶3The respondent no. 2 is present in Court today and is identified by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.20 18:00:41 +05'30'
CRL.M.C. 2197/2026
Page 2 of 2 pages counsel for petitioner (this is a Criminal Complaint Case). I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all her disputes with the petitioner. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioner. It is specifically stated by respondent no.2 that she is undergoing some medical treatment for a complicated disease, so she has opted to settle the dispute without expecting any monetary compensation. Respondent no.2 also submits in response to a specific query that she does not want time to think again.
¶4Having spoken with respondent no. 2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through a full dress trial.
¶5Therefore, the petition is allowed and Complaint Case No. 450/2022 of Police Station Kalyan Puri, Delhi for offence under Section 354/354A/354D/341 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same pending in the Court of Ms. Ritika Kansal, JMFC, East, Karkardooma Court are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 20, 2026/ry
GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,
2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.20 18:00:25 +05'30'
Case details
Parties and counsel
CRL.M.C. 2197/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010115952026 + CRL.M.C. 2197/2026 FARAT HUSSAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nasimuddin, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.