Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Criminal Force and Assault
Section 354A: Sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) A man committing any of the following acts—
(i) physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; or
(ii) a demand or request for sexual favours; or
(iii) showing pornography against the will of a woman; or
(iv) making sexually coloured remarks, shall be guilty of the offence of sexual harassment.
(2) Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (i) or clause (ii) or clause (iii) of sub-section (1) shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (iv) of sub-section (1) shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 354A
-
Suneeti Toteja v. State of U.P. & Another
Whether, in light of the facts and circumstances of this case and the position of law apropos to the sanction for prosecution, the High Court ought to have exercised its powers u/s.482 of the CrPC to quash the…
-
Ramji Lal Bairwa & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Issue arose as regards whether a third party to a criminal proceeding got locus standi to challenge the order quashing the FIR lodged against the teacher by the father of the minor victim under the Penal Code, POCSO Act…
- State of Rajasthan v. Asharam @ Ashumal
- Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K & Anr.
- Deepak S/O Laxman Dongre v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Attorney General for India v. Satish and Another
- Tarun Jit Tejpal v. The State of Goa & Anr.
- Sasikala Pushpa and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu
- The Secretary, Lucy Sequeira Trust and Anr. v. Kailash Ramesh Tandel and Ors.
- Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Mahender Chawla & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Harita Sunil Parab v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others
- Independent Thought v. Union of India & Anr.
- Shamsher Singh Verma v. State of Haryana