VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Basant Kumar Agarwal & Another v. Om Prakash Arya & Another

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 October 2011
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P. 58/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar

Judgment

ORDER

20.rti.20tt l. Learned counsel for the Respondents on instructions states that the Respondent is agreed that the Arbitrator suggested by the Petitioner, i.e., Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, rlo C3ll5,Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, New Delhi, may act as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties. Learned counsel for the Respondents further states that the .Petitioners should not create any third parfy rights or alter the properfy in question, i.e., plot No. BG-331, Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar, Delhi in any manner Arb. P. 19/2011 & O. M. P. 58/2011 Prye2of2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. t -^r, whatsoever. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners will not create any third parfy rights or alter the property in question in any manner whatsoever during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings. The above statement is placed on record.

¶2Accordingly, this Court appoints Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, r/o C3lI5, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, Delhi, as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The fees of the learned Arbitrator will be in terms of the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre (Administrative Costs and Aibitrators' Fees) Rules ('Rules'). The Petitioners are bound by the undertaking as recorded in para 1 above.

¶3A copy of this order along with the copy of the Rules be forthwith delivered to the learned Arbitrator who will take steps in accordance with law.

¶4The petitions are disposed of. Order dasti. \.-4,h \/ MURALIDHAR, J S. ocToBER 20, 20ll ha Arb. P. 19/2011 & O. M. P. 58/2011

Case details

Parties and counsel

,j ir ,l $_* #T + #23 -t- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 19/20L1 BASANT KUMAR AGARW AL & ANOTIIER ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate. versus OM PRAKASH ARYA & ANOTIIER ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asim Naseem, Advocate. o.M.P. 5812011. o/o BASANT KUMAR AGARWAL & ANOTHER ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate. VETSUS OM PRAKASH ARYA & ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asim Naseem, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.