- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2017
- Bench
- Siddharth Mridul, Deepa Sharma
- Case no.
- LPA 83/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Siddharth MridulFollow Deepa Sharma
Judgment
O R D E R %
03.11.2017 After some arguments, Mr. K.C. Mittal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to institute a review petition in accordance with law, on the assertion that there is an error of fact apparent on the face of the record, in relation to the impugned judgment dated 8th December, 2016. Leave and liberty granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed off. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J DEEPA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 03, 2017/rs
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 83/2017 & C.M. Nos. 4027/2017 (stay) & 4028/2017 (Exemption) K M TOMAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Amit Prakash Shahi and Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.