- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2024
- Bench
- Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
- Case no.
- CS(COMM) 37/2022
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2024
CS(COMM) 37/2022 and I.A. 44490/2024 (under the aegis of Section 89 read with Order XXIII Rules 1 and 3 CPC for withdrawal of the suit)
¶1This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXIII Rules 1 and 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC') seeking withdrawal of the suit.
¶2Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the suit is sought to be withdrawn in view of the settlement agreement dated 21.08.2024 arrived at between the parties.
¶3He states that as per the terms of the settlement, the plaintiff has undertaken to unconditionally withdraw the present the suit.
¶4He states that reference to Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC made in the captioned application is inadvertent and may be permitted to be deemed as withdrawn. This is a digitally signed order. 5. In view of the submissions made on behalf the plaintiff and prayers the captioned application is accordingly allowed and the suit is hereby dismissed without reserving any liberty.
¶6All pending applications shall stand disposed of.
¶7All further dates of hearing in the suit are hereby cancelled. I.A. 44491/2024 (under Section 29 CPC read with Section 16A of the Court Fee Act, 1870 for refund of the Court Fee citing settlement of the suit)
¶8This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking refund of the Court fee in view of the fact that the suit is sought to be withdrawn in pursuance to the settlement agreement.
¶9For the reasons stated in the application, the captioned application stands allowed.
¶10The Registry is directed to refund the Court fee as per Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act, 1870 in accordance with the law.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
NOVEMBER 8, 2024/msh/ms
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 37/2022 TAKING INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijit Mishra, Advocate (through VC) versus NAVYUG SALES CORPORATION .....Defendant Through: Ms. Vidhi Goel, Advocate (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.