VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2025 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Raghuvansh Mani @ Sajan Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 December 2025
Case no.
12693/2025

Follow Allahabad High Court

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -12693 of 2025 Court No. -15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case as well as in the four cases reflected in the gang chart. It is further submitted that in all the cases mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has already been enlarged on bail, and the relevant bail orders have been placed on record collectively as Annexure No. 3 to the bail application. Apart from the cases shown in the gang chart, there are four other criminal cases pending against the accused-applicant, in which also he has been granted bail. The corresponding bail orders have been filed collectively as Annexure No. 4 to the bail application. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 29.04.2025 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. Upon due consideration of the facts that the applicant has already been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raghuvansh Mani @ Sajan Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) enlarged on bail in the cases mentioned in the gang chart as well as in the other four cases, no other criminal case is pending against him beyond the aforesaid eight cases, and he is in custody since 29.04.2025, this Court finds the present case to be a fit one for granting bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Raghuvansh Mani @ Sajan Tiwari, involved in Case Crime No. 242/2025, U/Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.

(iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 16, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 12693 of 2025 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.