Pavitharan Pachakkandy v. Shri.Ajay Kumar Bhalla Ias

2026:MHC:272 __________Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM CONT P No. 2704, 2703, 2702, 2705, 2740, 2693, 2696, 2695 and 2699 of 2023 Pavitharan Pachakkandy ..Petitioner(s) Vs

¶1Shri.Ajay Kumar Bhalla IASThe Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. [R1 deleted as per order of the Court d dated 11.12.2023]

¶2Rajeev Verma, IAS., Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.

¶3P.Jawahar,IAS., The Secretary, Finance Department, Chief Secretariat, The Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry.

¶4L.Kumar IAS., M/s.Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited, Agro House, Thattanchavady, Puducherry, The Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary-Cum-Chairman to Government (Agriculture) Office of Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.

¶5K.Shiva Shanmugam The Managing Director, M/s.Puduchery Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited, Agro House, Thanttanchavady, Puducherry - 605 009 ..Contemnor(s) To issue notice to the respondents herein and punish them for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the final order passed by this Court dated 25-11-2022 made in W.P.No.18252 of 2019. __________Page 2 of 4 In All Petitions For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Malaviya For Contemnor(s): Mr.S.Raveekumar Government Pleader (Puducherry) COMMON ORDER Contempt Petitions have been filed to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order dated 25.11.2022.

¶2Learned Government Pleader (Puducherry) appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that issues were considered by Government of Puducherry and an order was passed by the Government of Puducherry on

17.07.2023.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court has directed to resolve the issues. Therefore, the said order cannot be treated as compliance.

¶4The interpretation offered on behalf of the petitioners is unacceptable, in view of the fact that this Court directed the respondents to consider the issues and take a decision as expeditiously as possible in order to resolve the issues.

¶5Government has considered the issues, and if the order passed by Government is not favourable to the petitioners, they have to challenge the __________Page 3 of 4 said order in the manner known to law.

¶6Thus, there is no willfull disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. Accordingly, the Contempt Petitions are closed. Consequently, the connected Sub-Applications, if any, are closed. No costs. 22-01-2026 Note: Registry is directed to type the remaining cause titles. Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GD To

¶1Shri.Ajay Kumar Bhalla IAS The Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶2Rajeev Verma, Ias.,Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Puducherry, Cheif Secretariat, Puducherry.

¶3P.Jawahar,ias.,The Secretary, Finance Department, Chief Secretariat, The Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry.

¶4L.Kumar Ias.,M/s.Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited, Agro House, Thattanchavady, Puducherry, The Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary-Cum-Chairman to Government (Agriculture) Office of Chief Secretariat, puducherry.

¶5K.Shiva ShanmugamThe Managing Director, M/s.Puduchery Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited, Agro House, Thanttanchavady, Puducherry - 605 009 __________Page 4 of 4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. GD CONT P No. 2704, 2703, 2702, 2705, 2740, 2693, 2696, 2695 and 2699 of 2023 22-01-2026