VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Mayilsamy v. The Executive Engineer

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 January 2026
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, C.Kumarappan
Case no.
WP 17377/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,) The present Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the show cause notice dated 27.03.2025 and the order passed by the Assistant Engineer dated 27.03.2025.

¶2Notice under Rule 6(1) of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'], has been issued and without affording opportunity to the petitioner, the final order has also been passed on the same day. In view of the directions issued by the High Court in W.P.No.1935 of 2025 dated

23.01.2025, this Court directed for disposal of the complaint for removal of encroachment in water body. In any event the petitioner is entitled for an opportunity to submit his explantation along with documents, if any. Since no such opportunity has been provided, this Court is inclined to grant time to file explantation in response to the statutory notice issued under the Act on 27.03.2025.

¶3In view of the fact that no opportunity has been afforded to the petitioner, the impugned order issued by the Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Organization/ 3rd respondent in letter No. nfh/ /c/bgh/- br/g[/-2025 dated 27.03.2025 alone is set aside. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to submit his explantation along with documents, if any, in response to the statutory notice issued under form III on

27.03.2025 within a period of ten (10) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of any such explanation, the respondents shall consider the same and thereafter take final decision and pass final orders within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter. The encroachments if identified in the water body, then it is to be removed without causing any further delay, in any event, the enforcement actions shall be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of its identification.

¶4With these directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed in part. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S,J.,) (C.K,J.,)

19.01.2026 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No dsa To:

1.The Executive Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Makkinampatti, Pollachi – 642 003, Coimbatore District.

2.The Assistant Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Palladam, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

3.The Assistant Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Senjeripudur, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa

19.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

2026:MHC:203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.01.2026 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.No.19699 of 2025 M.Mayilsamy ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Executive Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Makkinampatti, Pollachi – 642 003, Coimbatore District. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Palladam, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Parambikulam – Aliyar Project Scheme, Water Resources Organization, Senjeripudur, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned Letter issued by the 3rd responded in his Letter No.Ko. /AE/Sae.Pu/2025, dated 27.03.2025 along with notice in Form – III, dated 27.03.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.