M/S Sesha Tools Private Limited v. Union of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 3645 OF 2026 (T-RES) BETWEEN:

¶1M/S SESHA TOOLS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO. 54/4, PAUL WELLS ROAD, SRIPURAM COLONY ST. THOMAS MOUNT, CHENNAI - 600 016 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. A. KUMAR, GROUP COMPANY SECRETARY … PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. MANISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE) AND:

¶1UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶2ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA e -e2e-eeeee e e NC:(2026:KHC:7035 WP(No.(3645(of(2026 SOUTH,DIVISION-4,,, BENGALURU,SOUTH,COMMISSIONERATE,, THC-WING,,7 ,FLOOR,,KENDRIYA,SADAN, KORAMANGALA,,, BENGALURU,-,560,034,

3., HDFC,BANK,LIMITED, JP,NAGAR,BRANCH,, (BRANCH,CODE:,000133),, NDNO.,37/953,,2 ,PHASE,,, TH24 ,MAIN,,JP,NAGAR,, BENGALURU,,, KARNATAKA,-,560,078,, REPRESENTED,BY,THE,BRANCH,MANAGER,

4., HINDUSTAN,AERONAUTICS,LIMITED, CORPORATE,OFFICE, 15/1,CUBBON,ROAD, BANGALORE,-,560,001, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,, AUTHORISED,SIGNATORY, …,RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,ARAVIND,V.,CHAVAN,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R1,AND,R2;, NOTICE,TO,R3,AND,R4,ARE,DISPENSED,WITH,, V/O,DATED,06.02.2025), , THIS,W.P.,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLES,226,AND,227,OF, THE,CONSTITUTION,OF,INDIA,,PRAYING,TO,I.,ISSUE,A,WRIT, OF,CERTIORARI,OR,ANY,OTHER,APPROPRIATE,WRIT,,ORDER,, OR,DIRECTION,,QUASHING,THE,IMPUGNED,NOTICE,IN,FORM, GST, DRC-13, DATED, JANUARY, 27,, 2026,, BEARING, FILE, NO., GEXCOM/TAR/D/ST/3426/2025-CGST-DIV-SD-4-COMMRTE, (ANNEXURE-A),, ISSUED, BY, RESPONDENT, NO., 2, TO, RESPONDENT, NO., 3,, AS, BEING, ILLEGAL,, ARBITRARY,, AND, WITHOUT, JURISDICTION,, THEREBY, DE-FREEZING, AND, RESTORING,THE,BANK,ACCOUNTS,OF,THE,PETITIONER,HELD, WITH,RESPONDENT,NO.,3,BANK,AND,ETC.,

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Sri. Aravind V. Chavan, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. Issuance of notice to respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with

¶2The petition has been filed calling in question the validity of the notice at Annexure-A issued in Form-GST-DRC-13. The said notice is issued to the bank of the petitioner for an amount of Rs.1,27,89,669/-. Petitioner has further sought for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to refrain from taking coercive steps for recovery of the demand pursuant to the order-in-original.

¶3The case made out by the petitioner is that steps have been taken to recover amount due pursuant to the order in original passed by the respondents. It is

further submitted that appeal was filed and pre-deposit as required for the purpose of stay of recovery in the appeal proceedings was also complied with. It is their further case that they were not aware of the further proceedings in the appeal. Accordingly it is submitted that the action of exercising lien over the bank account of the petitioner and further contemplated steps for recovery are uncalled for.

¶4Sri. C. Manishan Khar, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that there was a change in address and the same had been intimated to the department by way of communications made in June, 2025.

¶5Sri. Aravind V. Chavan, learned counsel upon instructions submits that the appeal itself has been disposed of on 30.10.2024 and respondents were not aware regarding change in address. It is further submitted that even otherwise the intimation regarding change in address was made much later in June, 2025 and

accordingly the department cannot be faulted for having attempted communication of the order to the old address.

¶6Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has come to know about the order in appeal now, they would take appropriate steps to challenge the same in accordance with law before the Tribunal. It is further submitted that, to demonstrate bonafides, as the account of the petitioner is already a subject matter of lien, the amount of demand flowing from the order in original as confirmed by the appellate authority has already been deposited in the account and it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the lien may continue till the petitioner files an appeal and obtain necessary orders in appeal.

¶7Taking note of such stand, the petition itself could be disposed of in the following terms:

(a) Insofar as the date of knowledge of the order in appeal, in light of the submission regarding change in

address, though there may be some lapse on the part of the petitioner insofar as change in address was not intimated to the authorities in time, however, it would meet the ends of justice in taking the date of communication as this day on which day the copy of the order is furnished to the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.

(b) The submission made regarding the lien may be permitted to continue till orders are passed in appeal to be filed before the Tribunal, is taken note of and placed on record and an affidavit to be filed by the petitioner within one week from today with an undertaking that petitioner would continue to maintain the balance in account as there is already a subsisting lien.

(c) In light of the undertaking, needless to state the lien of the respondents may continue till interim orders are passed in the appeal to be filed. No further steps for recovery may be taken for a period of 60 days. Petitioner to take appropriate steps to challenge the order in appeal within such time. All contentions are kept open.

¶8Accordingly petition is disposed of. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP