Smt B S Roopashri v. Sri B K Raghuveer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14382 OF 2021 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:

SMT B.S.ROOPASHRI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS NO.1392, 5TH CROSS KRISHNAMURTHYPURAM MYSURU - 570 004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRATAP KUMAR V., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI B.K.RAGHUVEER AGED 54 YEARS

¶2MASTER ARJAVA AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY B.K.RAGHUVEER

BOTH RESIDING AT #295, "PANASU", 4TH CROSS CFTRI LAYOUT BOGADHI 2ND STAGE MYSURU-570 026 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.Y.K.NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE,

by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

MYSURU CULMINATING IN DISMISSAL OF THE ORDER DATED:

07.04.2021 IN I.A.NO.V AND I.A.NO.II PASSED IN G AND WC NO.9/2021.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

ORAL ORDER

Both the parties have filed a joint memo dated

05.10.2026 before this court, which reads as thus: Joint Memo

¶1The parties in the above case have settled their disputes amicably, the Petitioner and Respondent No. I have obtained Divorce decree and their marriage has been dissolved by order/decree of divorce dated 09-03-2021 before Principal Family Court, Mysore. The Petitioner has remarried and she is residing with her present husband in Bangalore. Hereby, the parties have agreed for the following terms:-

¶2The parties have agreed that the Respondent No.2 will be in the custody of Respondent No.1 and the Respondent No. 1 will take care of all the interests and maintenance of Respondent No.2.

¶3Both the parties have agreed that the Petitioner shall come only with the second child and have the custody of Respondent No.2 on the first and third Saturday's and Sunday's of the month without the presence of the Respondent No.1 and take the Respondent No.2 out of Mysuru within 50 kms radius and return Respondent No.2 to Respondent No. 1 on Sunday evening by 6 P.M. The said custody will be subject to mutual convenience and also so as not to affect the overall education

and school and other activities of the Respondent No.2.

¶4This apart, the Petitioner shall come only with the second child and have custody of 2nd Respondent during first week of school vacations in Summer, Winter and Dasara Holidays in Mysuru depending on mutual convenience and also so as not to affect the overall education and school and other activities of the Respondent No.2.

¶5The parties have settled all the claims and they do not have any claims against each other and against each other's properties hereafter.

¶6The parties have further agreed that the petitioner will withdraw the instant writ petition in W.P No. 14382/2021 which is pending before this Hon'ble Court and the G&WC No.09/2021 pending before Principal Family Judge, Mysuru.

¶7The Parties confirm that there is no collusion between the parties and they have voluntarily agreed for the above settlement after considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and the parties confirm that the above settlement is also in the interest of and for the benefit of respondent No.2.

¶2Both the parties are present before this court. In light of the joint memo filed, the writ petition stands disposed of. The disputes between the parties are settled, and they also seek to withdraw the G & WC. Accordingly, this Court is passing the following:

ORDER i. In light of the joint memo filed before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of. ii. Within one week from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, the wife shall file an appropriate application before family court seeking withdrawal of the G&WC. iii. Pending IAs., in this petition shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58 *AK