VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Sri B Suresh v. Sri Ravi

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
5 October 2026
Bench
K. V. Aravindauthor
Case no.
WP 26318/2026

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow K. V. Aravind

Judgment

ORDER DATED 30/07/2026 IN OS 5513/2026 ANNX-B ON IA NO. 1 BY XL ADDL. C.C. AND S. JUDGE BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

ORAL ORDER

The present petition is filed impugning the order dated

30.07.2026, whereby the Trial Court directed both parties to maintain status quo in respect of the suit schedule property, issued notice on I.A. No.1/2026 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC'), and also issued summons in the suit.

¶2Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, by way of the application, a prayer was made to restrain the respondent herein from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The Trial Court, however, directed both parties to maintain status quo. Consequently, the alleged interference with, and damage caused to, the petitioner's pipelines continue to remain unaddressed.

¶3Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that, having regard to the nature of the dispute and

the reliefs sought in the suit and the application, the Trial Court was justified in directing the parties to maintain status quo.

¶4Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶5In the present petition, it would suffice to direct the parties to maintain status quo, as directed by the Trial Court by order dated 30.07.2026, and to direct the Trial Court to finally adjudicate I.A. No.1/2026, filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC, within a time-bound period.

¶6In that view of the matter, the following order: O R D E R

(i) The writ petition is disposed of.

(ii) Both parties are directed to maintain status

quo, as directed by the Trial Court by order

dated 30.07.2026, until consideration of I.A.

No.1/2026 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1

and 2 of the CPC.

(iii) The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the

said application within one month from today.

(iv) The respondent is at liberty to file objections

to the said application within two weeks from

today.

(v) Both parties are at liberty to seek advancement of the case for the purpose of compliance with the aforesaid directions.

SD/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 26318 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B SURESH S/O LATE BOMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.27 AND 28, 18TH CROSS, RAJEEV GANDHI NAGARA, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU -560068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARUN K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI RAVI S/O BABU REDDY, RESIDING AT NO.1092, 19TH CROSS, 14TH MAIN ROAD, HSR LAYOUT 3RD SECTOR, BANGALORE-560102. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIJAYA PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/MODIFY THE

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.