VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Satish B v. T Sudhakar

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
7 September 2026
Bench
Geetha K.Bauthor
Case no.
CRL.RP 347/2026

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Geetha K.B

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 347 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

¶1SATISH B SON OF LATE BALU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 17, FIRST FLOOR 4TH MAIN, CHAMUNDESHWARI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU 560 097 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUMAN K S, ADVOCATE) AND:

¶1T SUDHAKAR SON OF MR. THIMMA REDDY AGED MAJOR RESIDING AT NO. 4, 9TH MAIN ROAD J. P. PARK, BRINDAVANA NAGARA, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU 560 054 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. MAMATHA ROY, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.11.2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 579/2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU (ANNEXURE - A) AND ETC.,

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.

ORAL ORDER

Mediation report received stating that parties have settled the dispute. Both parties are present and identified by their respective counsels. Today, the respondent is receiving DD bearing No.605689 drawn on Karnataka Bank Ltd, Bengaluru Chennai Service Branch for Rs.2,42,500/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Two Thousand and Five Hundred Only) in respect of full and final settlement of the case and revision petitioner has no objection to withdraw the amount already in deposit in this case by the respondent/complainant.

¶2The relevant terms and conditions of the settlement are as follows: " II. Both the parties have agreed to the following terms and conditions between them:

a. Both the parties withdraw all allegations levelled against each other.

b. The petitioner and respondent herein agree that there has been financial transaction between them, and they have settled the disputed issues on their own without there being any coercion or force or undue influence on each other or by any third person.

c. The petitioner herein agrees to pay a total sum of Rs. SIX LAKHS to the respondent herein in full and final settlement of all his claims against the petitioner. The respondent herein agrees to receive the said sum of Rs. SIX LAKHS in full and final payment of all his claims against the petitioner herein.

d. The parties herein agree that there is a sum of Rs.3,57,500/-(Rupees Three Lakh Fifty Seven Thousand and Five Hundred) in deposit before the Hon'ble Court, deposited by the petitioner herein. The petitioner herein has no objection for the respondent receiving the same towards part payment of total sum of SIX LAKHS payable by him to the respondent.

e. The petitioner herein agrees to pay balance sum of Rs.2,42,500/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Two thousand and Five Hundred) on or before 05/09/2026 by way of Demand Draft drawn in favor of the Respondent herein, and handover the same to the respondent before the Hon'ble Court. The respondent has no objection to receive the amount of Rs.2,42,500/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Two Thousand and five hundred) in the aforesaid manner."

¶3On enquiry, it is noticed that the settlement between parties is voluntary and lawful one. Hence mediation report is accepted.

¶4In view of settlement between the parties, the following order is passed: ORDER

(i) The Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of .

(ii) Proceedings in C.C.No.30189/2018 passed by the Hon'ble XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru is set aside.

(iii) The amount in deposit before Trial Court be disbursed to the respondent/complainant on proper identification.

(GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE

SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.