- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 7 September 2026
- Bench
- Shivashankar Amarannavar
- Case no.
- MFA 2253/2025
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Shivashankar Amarannavar
Judgment
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:05.11.2024 PASSED IN MVC No.1106/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-V, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant -claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in judgment and award dated 05.11.2024 passed in MVC No.1106/2022 by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT-V, Chitradurga.
¶2Even though the appeal is listed today for admission, it is taken up for disposal with the consent of learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent.
¶3The appellant made a claim petition praying to award compensation for the injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident occurred on 02.05.2022 contending that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of but bearing registration No.KA-16/C-8849. The Tribunal after recording the evidence of the parties, appreciating the evidence assessed the compensation and awarded compensation under various heads as under: Sl.No. Heads Amount in (Rs.)
¶01Towards Pain and Suffering 50,000/-
¶02Towards Medical Expenses 77,077/-
¶03Towards Traveling, attendant and incidental expenses 10,000/-
¶04Towards loss of discomfort and amenities 20,000/-
¶05Towards loss of income 3,51,000/-Total 5,08,077/-
¶4The Tribunal also awarded interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization and directed respondent No.2 -insurer to deposit the award amount with interest. The claimant seeking enhancement of compensation has filed the present appeal.
¶5Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2 –insurer.
¶6The accident occurred on 02.05.2022 and the claimant was aged 35 years as on the date of accident. Considering the said age, the Tribunal has rightly taken the multiplier '15'. Learned counsel for appellant has not disputed disability taken by the Tribunal at 15%. The notional income fixed for the year 2022 by Karnataka State Legal Services Authority is Rs.15,500/- and the same is to be taken as against Rs.15,000/- as taken by the Tribunal. In view of the same, loss of future income is calculated as under: Rs.15,500/- x 12 x 15 x 15% =Rs.4,18,500/-.
¶7The claimant has sustained right foot crush injury, fracture of first metatarsal right foot and second toe of right foot is amputated. Disability certificate –Ex.P13 indicate that there is missing of great toe and second toe of right foot. Considering the compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards pain and suffering in a sum of Rs.50,000/- requires to be enhanced to Rs.70,000/- and loss of amenities in a sum of Rs20,000/- requires to be enhanced to Rs.40,000/-. The claimant's occupation is tailoring and considering the amputation of two toes of right leg affected functioning as tailor and therefore, she is entitled to loss of income during laid period in a sum of Rs.46,500/- (Rs.15,500/-x3 months). The claimant has been admitted in the hospital for 32 days as per Ex.P10 and Ex.P11 discharge summary. But the Tribunal has taken period of hospitalization as 08 days. Considering the said aspect, the claimant is entitled to attendant, conveyance charges, food and nourishment etc., in sum of Rs.32,000/- (Rs.1,000/- x32 days) as against Rs.10,000/- as awarded by the Tribunal.
¶8In view of the above, the claimant is entitled to compensation under various heads as under: Sl.No. Heads Amount in (Rs.)
¶01Towards Pain and Suffering 70,000/-
¶02Towards Medical Expenses 77,077/-
¶03Towards Traveling, attendant and incidental expenses 32,000/-
¶04Towards loss of discomfort and amenities 40,000/-
¶05Towards loss of income 4,18,500/-
¶06Towards loss of income during laid up period 46,500/-Total 6,84,077/-
Considering the above aspects, the claimant is entitled to total compensation of Rs.6,84,077/- as against Rs.5,08,077/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest at the interest of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. Consequently, the claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.1,76,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. Respondent No.2 -insurer is liable to pay the said enhanced compensation with interest.
¶9In view of the above, the following:
ORDER
i) The appeal is allowed in part.
ii) The appellant -claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.1,76,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization.
iii) Respondent No.2 -insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation with interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from this day.
iv) The appellant -claimant is entitled to release of entire enhanced compensation.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 Ct.sm
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 2253 OF 2025 (MV-I) BETWEEN: KAMALAMMA W/O CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O SIDDAVVANADURGA KOTE VILLAGE CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE- 577 501. …APPELLANT (BY SRI ASHWATH C M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI PRAKASHA H C, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RUDRESH H B S/O H.BASAVARAJA MAJOR R/O KEB COLONY NAYAKANAHATTI CHALLAKEE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA JAGALURU MAHALINGAPPA TOWERS DAVANAGERE ROAD CHITRADURGA-577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ASHOK KUMAR V, ADVOCATE FOR R2 R1-SERVICE OF NOTICE IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD. 22.7.2026) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.