VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Smt Mangala v. Sri M Basavaraja

Partly Allowed
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
13 August 2026
Bench
Shivashankar Amarannavarauthor
Case no.
MFA 4323/2026

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Shivashankar Amarannavar

Judgment

((((((((((((HC-KAR, NC:(2026:KHC:43315( MFA(No.(4323(of(2026( ( ,,,,,,,,,, , CNR:(KAHC010396642026( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(

TH DATED(THIS(THE(13 (DAY(OF(AUGUST,(2026(

BEFORE(

THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(SHIVASHANKAR(AMARANNAVAR( MISCELLANEOUS(FIRST(APPEAL(NO.(4323(OF(2026((MV-I)( BETWEEN:(( ( , SMT.,MANGALA,

W/O,LATE,NAGARAJAPPA,,, AGED,ABOUT,39,YEARS,, N/W,R/O,C/O,RUDRESH,, NEHARU,NAGARA,,HOLALKERE,ROAD,, R/O,T.,NULENURU,VILLAGE,,HOLALKERE,TALUK,,, CHITRADURGA,,-,577,526., …APPELLANT,

(BY,SRI.,SHIVAKUMARAPPA,T.C,,ADVOCATE),

AND:(

(

1., SRI.,M.,BASAVARAJA, S/O,K.B.,MANJAPPA,,, MAJOR,, R/O,KONANUR,VILLAGE,,, DODALAGATTA,,POST,,CHITRADURGA,TALUK,,,Digitallytisigne dtiby LAKSHMINARAYANA AND,DISTRICT,,-,577,501., MURTHY0RAJASHRI ,Location:0HIGH COURT0OF 2., M/S.,IFFCO,-TOKIO,GENERAL,, KARNATAKA INSURANCE,CO.,LTD.,, BY,ITS,AUTHORIZED,REPRESENTATIVE/, BRANCH,,MANAGER,SERVICE,OFFICE,,, BHIMA,SAHINK,, CHITRADURGA,TOWN,-,577,501., …RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,B.C.,SEETHARAMA,RAO,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R2;, ,,,,,,VIDE,ORDER,DATED,23.06.2026,,NOTICE,TO,R1,IS,, ,,,,,,DISPENSED,WITH),

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED. 28/01/2026 PASSED IN MVC NO.1250/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT-V AT CHITRADURGA., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in the Judgment and Award dated

28.01.2026 passed in MVC No.1250/2022 by II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT-V, Chitradurga.

¶2Even though the matter is listed today for admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer, the matter is taken up for disposal.

¶3The appellant/claimant made a claim petition seeking for award of compensation for the injury sustained by her in a road traffic accident occurred on 11.04.2022 contending that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of Car bearing registration No.KA-16-P-2716.

¶4The Tribunal recorded the evidence adduced by the parties and upon appreciating the evidence on record, assessed compensation and awarded compensation under various heads as under: Sl. No. Particulars

Amount

¶1Towards pain and sufferings Rs. 30,000/-

¶2Towards Conveyance, Attendant charges and nourishing food Rs. 10,000/-

¶3Towards loss of discomfort and amenities Rs. 5,000/-

¶4Towards loss of income during laid down period Rs. 15,000/-

¶5Towards permanent disability Rs. 2,20,608/-

¶6Towards medical bills Rs. 27,570/-

Total Rs. 3,08,178/-

¶5The Tribunal has also awarded the interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and directed respondent No.2/insurer to pay the compensation awarded with interest. The claimant has filed present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

¶6Heard the learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer.

¶7Learned counsel for appellant would contend that, considering the injury sustained, the compensation awarded for pain and sufferings, loss of amenities and loss of income during laid up period are on lower side. The claimant has been admitted in the hospital for eleven (11) days and the compensation awarded for attendant and conveyance charges is on lower side. The compensation awarded for loss of future income and medical expenses is just and proper. With these, he prayed to allow the appeal.

¶8Learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer would contend that, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper and there are no grounds for enhancement. With these, he prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

¶9Having heard learned counsel for appellant/claimant and learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer, the Court has perused the Judgment and Award.

¶10The claimant is a lady and she was aged thirty five (35) years as on the date of accident. The accident occurred on 11.04.2022. The Tribunal taken the notional income of Rs.15,000/- has rightly calculated loss of future income taking the disability at 7.66% and applied multiplier '16'. Considering that the claimant has suffered fracture of upper limb, the compensation awarded towards pain and sufferings in a sum of Rs.30,000/- is just and proper. But the compensation awarded towards loss of

amenities in a sum of Rs.5,000/- is not proper and the claimant is entitled to Rs.20,000/- towards loss of amenities.

¶11The claimant has been admitted in the hospital for eleven (11) days and therefore, she is entitled to attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment charges in a sum of Rs.11,000/- (Rs.1,000/- X 11 days) as against Rs.10,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.

¶12Considering fracture sustained and occupation of the claimant as agriculture, she has to take rest at least for two (02) months and therefore, she is entitled to loss of income during laid up period in a sum of Rs.30,000/- as against Rs.15,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has rightly awarded loss of future income due to disability and medical expenses.

¶13Considering all the above aspects, the claimant is entitled to total compensation under various heads as under:

Sl. No. Particulars

Amount

¶1Towards pain and sufferings Rs. 30,000/-

¶2Towards Conveyance, Attendant charges and nourishing food Rs. 11,000/-

¶3Towards loss of discomfort and amenities Rs. 20,000/-

¶4Towards loss of income during laid down period Rs. 30,000/-

¶5Towards permanent disability Rs. 2,20,608/-

¶6Towards medical bills Rs. 27,570/-

Total Rs. 3,39,178/-

¶14The claimant is entitled to total compensation of Rs.3,39,178/- as against Rs.3,08,178/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

¶15Consequently, claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.31,000/- (Rs.3,39,178/- - Rs.3,08,178/-) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

¶16Respondent No.2/insurer is liable to pay enhanced compensation amount with interest.

¶17In view of the above, the following:

ORDER

i) Miscellaneous First Appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii) The appellant/claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.31,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

iii) Respondent No.2/insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount with interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from this day.

iv) The appellant/claimant is entitled to release of entire enhanced compensation with interest.

Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.