VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Sri. Manoj v. Sri. Manjunath Shetty

Partly Allowed
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
13 August 2026
Bench
T.M.Nadafauthor
Case no.
MFA 8287/2023

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow T.M.Nadaf

Judgment

ORDER

(i) The appeal is allowed in part.

(ii) The Judgment and Award dated 21.08.2023, passed by the III Addl. Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru in MVC No.5695/2021 is modified and the compensation is reassessed.

(iii) The Claimant is entitled for another Global compensation of Rs.50,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

(iv) Respondent No.2 - Insurer shall deposit the entire Global compensation along with interest supra before the concerned Tribunal within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(v) Upon deposit, the entire amount shall be released in favor of the claimant after due identification.

(vi) The Trial Court Record secured, if any, shall be transmitted forthwith to the concerned Tribunal.

(vii) No order as to costs.

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 ct-vn

Case details

Parties and counsel

((((((((((((HC-KAR, NC:(2026:KHC:43063( MFA(No.(8287(of(2023( ( ,,,,,,,,,, , CNR:(KAHC010660562023( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( TH DATED(THIS(THE(13 (DAY(OF(AUGUST,(2026( BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(T.M.NADAF( MISCELLANEOUS(FIRST(APPEAL(NO.8287(OF(2023(MV-I)( BETWEEN:(( ( SRI.,MANOJ,, S/O,KRISHNAPPA,, AGED,ABOUT,23,YEARS,, R/AT,KARIBIRANAHALLI,VILLAGE,, JADIGENAHALLI,HOBLI,, HOSAKOTE,TALUK,, BENGALURU,RURAL,DISTRICT., …APPELLANT, (BY,SRI.,THIPPESWAMY,B,C.,,ADVOCATE), AND:( ( 1., SRI.,MANJUNATH,SHETTY,, S/O,KRISHNAPPA,SHETTY,, ATTIBELE,,ANEKAL,TALUK,, Digitally BENGALURU,RURAL,DISTRICT,-,562,107., signedtiby ,REKHA0R Location: 2., IFFCO,-TOKIA,GENERAL,, High0Courttiof INSURANCE,CO.,,LTD.,,Karnataka REPRESENTED,BY,MANAGER, SRI.,SHANTHI,TOWERS,,, TH RD5 ,,FLOOR,,3 ,,MAIN,,, NO,141,,EAST,OF,NGEF,LAYOUT,, KASTURI,NAGAR,,, BENGALURU,EAST,,-,560,043., …RESPONDENTS, ,(BY,SRI.,SHIVANNE,GOWDA,,ADVOCATE,FOR, ,,,,,,,SRI.,B.,PRADEEP,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R2,, ,,,,,,,VIDE,COURT,ORDER,DATED,13.08.2026,, ,,,,,,,NOTICE,TO,R1,IS,DISPENSED,WITH), THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:21.08.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.5695/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal by the claimant in MVC No.5695/2021 seeking enhancement of compensation, arising out of common Judgment and Award dated 21.08.2023, passed by the III Addl. Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru1. 2. Heard, Sri.Thippeswamy.B.C, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/claimant and Sri.B.C.Shivanne Gowda, learned counsel appearing for Sri.B.Pradeep, 1 'the Tribunal', for short learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurer. Notice to respondent No.1 is dispensed with vide order dated 13.08.2026. 3. The claimant said to have suffered Abrasion on knee and soft tissue injury and left arm tenderness. As per the Wound Certificate, injuries were shown as simple in nature. However, the doctor in his evidence has stated that the claimant has suffered left wrist drop, loss of power to the left wrist, loss of grip and holding strength in the left hand and stated that there is 56% disability to left hand and 19% at whole body. However, in his cross- examination, the Doctor has stated as under: "CfðzÁgÀjUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ªÀÄÆ¼É ªÀÄÄjvÀzÀ UÁAiÀÄ DVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. CfðzÁgÀjUÉ DzÀAvÀºÀ UÁAiÀÄ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀzÀ UÁAiÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆzÁVzÉ JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. ¥ÀjÃPÁë ªÉüÉAiÀİè JqÀUÉÊAiÀÄ £ÀgÀPÉÌ KlÄ ©¢ÝzÀÄÝ PÀAqÀħA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CfðzÁgÀjUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ±À¸ÀÛç aQvÉì DVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è." 4. The Tribunal upon this aspect of the matter, considered the disability at 2% and awarded appropriate compensation. However, in view of evidence as well as injuries suffered. The compensation awarded under the head 'Pain and Suffering', 'loss of income during laid up period' and 'loss of amenities' requires re-consideration. This Court instead of dwelling on each head, deem it proper to award Global compensation of Rs.50,000/-, which shall carry interest @ 6% per annum, from the date of petition till realization. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following:

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.