- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 10 August 2026
- Bench
- Ashok S.Kinagi
- Case no.
- WP 19411/2024
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Ashok S.Kinagi
Judgment
Order or Direction directing 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 19/06/2024 vide ANNEXURE 'V4' and accord promotion to the Petitioner in the vacancy arising at 20th roster point in the post of Superintendent as per C & R Rules, in the interest of justice and equity.
(iii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction
directing 1st and 2nd respondents to make appropriate corrections in the seniority list pertaining to the post of Superintendent by treating the promotions granted to 4th and 5th Respondent as against the 21st and 22nd roster points, in the interest of justice and equity.
(iv) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction directing 1st and 2nd respondents to grant all consequential benefits that are accrued to the petitioner arising out of promotion to the cadre of Superintendent w.e.f. 01/08/2018, in the interest of justice and equity.
(v) Issue such other Writ or Order or Direction as deemed fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
¶2The brief facts leading to filing of this writ petition are as follows:
2.1 The petitioner was appointed to the post of Typist at respondent No.3 - College vide order dated
26.03.2003. The Scrutiny Committee of respondent No.3 -
College in its meeting held on 16.12.2008 considering the eligibility of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Stenographer, the Committee recommended the name of the post of Stenographer since the petitioner had completed five and half years of service in the cadre of Typist and is qualified to hold the post of Stenographer. The recommendation produced by the petitioner is marked as Annexure-D.
2.2 The respondent No.3 vide communication dated
10.02.2009 had sought for approval for according the promotions to the various posts in the non-teaching cadre. Respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.05.2009 granted an approval for according the promotion to the various non-teaching posts. Respondent No.2 has approved the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Stenographer of respondent No.3-College. The respondent No.3-College vide its order dated 19.05.2009, promoted the petitioner to the post of Stenographer with effect from 16.12.2008.
Respondent No.2 vide Notification dated 26.03.2007 issued Cadre and Recruitment Rules for various posts in the Department of Technical Education. It is contented that the post of Superintendent for Cadre and Recruitment Rules is to be filled up only by way of promotion from the cadre of First Division Assistant and Stenographers in the ratio of 19:1. Every 20th vacancy in the cadre of Superintendent is to be filled by promotion from the cadre of Stenographer. The respondent No.3 – College sent a proposal for the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Superintendent vide Annexure-N.
2.3 Despite sending the proposal of the petitioner by respondent No.3-College, respondent No.2 did not consider the representation vide Annexure-V4 and requested to promote the petitioner in the vacancy arising at 20th roster point in the post of Superintendent as per Cadre and Recruitment Rules. Respondent No.2 did not
consider the representation. Hence, this writ petition is filed.
¶3Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.
¶4Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondent No.2 will consider the representation vide Annexure-V4 and also recommendation made by respondent No.3 vide Annexure-N and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
¶5In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the proposal forwarded by respondent No.3 and also to consider the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure-V4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶6In view of disposal of the main petition, pending I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Case details
Parties and counsel
((((((((((((HC-KAR, NC:(2026:KHC:42129( WP(No.(19411(of(2024( ( ,,,,,,,,,, , CNR:(KAHC010407482024( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( TH DATED(THIS(THE(10 (DAY(OF(AUGUST,(2026( BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(ASHOK(S.KINAGI( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(19411(OF(2024((S-RES)( BETWEEN:(( ( , SRI.,K,N,VEERESH, S/O,LATE,NARASHIMAIAH,, AGED,ABOUT,53,YEARS,, R/AT,NO.308,, THANISHKA,NILAYA,, SADASHIVANAGAR,, TEJUR,ROAD,AND,POST,, HASSAN,–,573,219, …PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,VAISHALI,HEGDE,,ADVOCATE), , AND:( ( Digitally 1., STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, signedtiby REP,BY,ITS,SECRETARY,, SHILPABAI0S DEPARTMENT,OF,TECHNICAL,EDUCATION,, Location: TANTRIKA,SHIKSHANA,BHAVAN,,HIGH PALACE,ROAD,,COURT0OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE,–,560,001, , 2., DIRECTORATE,OF,TECHNICAL,EDUCATION, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,DIRECTOR,, DEPARTMENT,OF,, TECHNICAL,EDUCATION,, TANTRIKA,SHIKSHANA,BHAVAN,, PALACE,ROAD,, BANGALORE,–,560,001, , 3., MALNAD,COLLEGE,OF,ENGINEERING, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,PRINCIPAL,, ((((((((((((HC-KAR, NC:(2026:KHC:42129( WP(No.(19411(of(2024( ( ,,,,,,,,,, , CNR:(KAHC010407482024( ( ( P.B.,NO.21,,SALAGAME,ROAD,, HASSAN,-,573,202, , 4., SMT.,H,R,KUMUDA, W/O,A,C,DIVAKARA,, AGED,ABOUT,51,YEARS,, SUPERINTENDENT,, ADMINISTRATIVE,OFFICE,, MALNAD,COLLEGE,OF,ENGINEERING,, HASSAN,–,573,202, , 5., SRI,B,R,RAVI, S/O,B,R,RAMANNA,, AGED,ABOUT,54,YEARS,, SUPERINTENDENT,,ADMINISTRATIVE,OFFICE,, MALNAD,COLLEGE,OF,ENGINEERING,,, HASSAN,–,573,202, …RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.G.RAMESH,NAIK,,AGA,FOR,R1,&,R2;, ,,,,,,SRI.P.N.MANMOHAN,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R3;, ,,,,,,SRI.G.S.VENKAT,SUBBARAO,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R4,&,R5), , , THIS, WRIT, PETITION, IS, FILED, UNDER, ARTICLES, 226, AND, 227, OF, THE, CONSTITUTION, OF, INDIA, PRAYING, TO, DIRECT, THE, R1, AND, R2, TO, ACT, ON, THE, PROPOSAL, DATED, 08.08.2019, SENT, BY, R3, COLLEGE, BEARING, NO.MCE/EST(1)2019-20/1044, ANNEXURE-N, AND, GRANT, APPROVAL,TO,THE,PROMOTION,OF,THE,PETITIONER,FROM,THE, CADRE, OF, STENOGRAPHER, TO, THE, CADRE, OF, SUPERINTENDENT, WITH, EFFECT, FROM, 01.08.2018, ALONG, WITH, ALL, CONSEQUENTIAL, BENEFITS, IN, THE, INTEREST, OF, JUSTICE,AND,EQUITY,AND,ETC.,, , , THIS,PETITION,,COMING,ON,FOR,PRELIMINARY,HEARING, IN, 'B', GROUP,, THIS, DAY,, ORDER, WAS, MADE, THEREIN, AS, UNDER:, , CORAM:,HON'BLE,MR.,JUSTICE,ASHOK,S.KINAGI, , ( ORAL ORDER Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: (i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or Order or Directions directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to act on the proposal dated 08/08/2019 sent by 3rd Respondent college vide ANNEXURE 'N' bearing No-MCE/EST(1) 2019-20/1044 and grant approval to the promotion of the Petitioner from the cadre of Stenographer to the cadre of Superintendent with effect from 01/08/2018 along with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice and equity. (ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate Writ or
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.