- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 29 July 2026
- Bench
- Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T
- Case no.
- WA 53/2023
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Anu SivaramanFollow Venkatesh Naik T
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2023 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
¶1EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION MEDICAL DIVISION IV, HQRS OFFICE, PANCHADEEP BHAVAN, C I G MARG, NEW DELHI-110002, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL
¶2THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, BENGALURU, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-10, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAH JODATTI, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GEETHADEVI M.P., ADV. FOR APPELLANTS) AND:
¶1DR.SNEHALATA S DAUGHTER OF S SHANKAR R, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka e -e2e-eeeee e e ((((((((((((HC-KAR NC:(2026:KHC:39578-DB WA(No.(53(of(2023 CNR:(KAHC010012912023 THRESIDING,AT,NO.3373,,4 ,CROSS,, GAYATRI,NAGAR,,NEAR,NAYAK,HOSPITAL,, SRIRAMPURAM,,, BENGALURU,560021.,
2., STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT,OF,HEALTH,AND,FAMILY,WELFARE,, ST105,,1 ,FLOOR,,, SECRETARIAT,BUILDING,,, VIKASA,SOUDHA,,SESHADRI,ROAD,, BENGALURU,560001,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,SECRETARY.,
3., KARNATAKA,EXAMINATIONS,AUTHORITY, THSAMPIGE,ROAD,,18 ,CROSS,, MALLESHWARAM,,BENGALURU-560012,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,DIRECTOR.,
4., KARNATAKA,MEDICAL,COUNCIL,, ND70,,2 ,FLOOR,,VAIDYAKEEYA,BHAVANA,, K.R.ROAD,,H.B.SAMAJA,ROAD,CORNER,, BASAVANAGUDI,BENGALURU-560001,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,REGISTRAR.,
5., RAJIV,GANDHI,UNIVERSITY,OF,HEALTH,SCIENCE,, TH4 ,,T,BLOCK,,JAYANAGAR,, BENGALURU,560001,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,REGISTRAR, …RESPONDENTS, (BY,,SRI.,GURUPADAPPA,GOLAPPA,CHAGASHETTI.,,ADVOCATE,, ,,,,,,,,FOR,R1;, SRI.,KHAMROZ,KHAN,,AGA,FOR,R3;, , SRI.,BASAVARAJ,S.,SAPPANNAVAR,,ADV.,FOR,R5,, , R2,,R4,AND,R6,ARE,SERVED,AND,UNREPRESENTED),
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18/10/2022 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.3370/2022 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON BLE COURT AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION WITH COSTS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the appellant brought to our attention the judgment of this Court in W.A.No.312/2020 dated 06.04.2026. It is submitted that the issues raised in this appeal are identical to those considered by this Court in the said appeal.
¶2We notice that the prayer in the writ petition from which this appeal arises was for "to declare and hold the respondents Nos.3 and 4 no legal basis to insist upon the petitioner to compulsory serve for a period of three years upon completion of the PG course at the respondent - college." The
writ petition was disposed of along with several other writ petitions by allowing the petitions and quashing the revision of bond conditions vide memorandum dated 28.07.2020. It is the case of the petitioners that it is in identical circumstances in respect of a different academic year that W.A.No.312/2020 is considered and directions were issued as under: "79. In view of the above, the present appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.
¶80We may note that during the course of the submissions, it was pointed out that some of the petitioners may have already taken up employment elsewhere and may not be in a position to render the services. It is also contended that some of the petitioners may have acquired further qualifications and therefore, if they are called upon to render any service at ESIC hospital, it should be experience.
¶81Those petitioners who are unable to join would necessarily be obliged to pay the reduced amount of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest. This Court is informed that some of the petitioners have paid the bond amount. It is also open for the petitioners to approach ESIC to grant them a reasonable time to join the services, and needless to state, ESIC would consider reasonable requests sympathetically. Illustratively, if a student is midway through another course. It would be open for the student to request that the commencement of the period of compulsory service be deferred and he be given appropriate time to join the services.
¶82Insofar as those petitioners who are willing to render the service (which is now confined to a period of one year), ESIC is at liberty to avail the services of those petitioners at any of the ESIC hospitals. However, ESIC would also consider the placing the petitioners in positions
experience and further qualifications."
¶3The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the finding in W.A.No.312/2020 would apply to this case as well.
¶4Having considered the contentions advanced and in view of the fact that the issue raised in this appeal is similar to that considered in W.A.No.312/2020, we pass the following: ORDER
i. The appeal is allowed in the following terms. ii. The petitioners in the writ petitions, who have approached the Employees State Insurance Corporation and have joined services in ESIC hospitals shall continue in service for a period of one year, which is the compulsory service as of now. iii. In case any of the writ petitioners who did not join the services of Corporation and who are willing to do so, may report before the ESIC informing of their willingness to join the services in ESIC Hospitals. If they do so, the ESIC shall consider their request for posting and post them in places commensurate with their qualifications subject to availability of posts. iv. Those petitioners who do not intend to join the ESIC service shall be obliged to pay the
reduced bond amount of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest. v. Further, it is open to the petitioners to approach the ESIC for grant of reasonable time either to join the services or to make the payment of the bond amount. vi. The ESIC shall consider placing the petitioners in positions experience and further qualifications.
Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.