VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Smt. G. Ashwathamma v. Smt. Anitha Madhushree N.,

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
21 July 2026
Bench
Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T
Case no.
RFA 1486/2025

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Anu SivaramanFollow Venkatesh Naik T

Judgment

Judgment and Decree dated

22.04.2025, and Execution Petition No.70/2025.

¶5In consideration of the receipt of the aforesaid settlement amount, the respondent voluntarily and unequivocally relinquishes, waive and abandon all their rights, title, interest and claims in respect of the decree schedule property and undertake that they shall not hereafter claim any right, title, interest, possession, specific performance or any other relief in respect thereof.

¶6The parties further agree that, in view of the amicable settlement, the Judgment and Decree dated 22.04.2025 passed in O.S. No.103/2020 by the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, KGF, be set aside, and consequently the suit for specific performance shall stand dismissed as settled out of Court.

¶7The respondent further declare that upon receipt of the aforesaid settlement amount, she has no subsisting claim of any nature whatsoever against the appellant in respect of the suit transaction, the suit schedule property or the subject matter of the present appeal. Likewise, the appellant shall have no claim against the respondent in relation thereto.

¶8The parties jointly undertake to withdraw and close Execution Petition No.70/2025 pending before Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, KGF, and consent for release/refund of the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- deposited by the decree-holder in Execution Petition

No.70/2025, together with accrued interest, if any, in favour of the respondent.

¶9Both the parties agree that the agreement for sale dated: 04.09.2019 would be rendered/cancelled.

¶10Both the parties state that the rental agreement entered between the appellant and GPA Holder of the respondent would stand cancelled and physical possession of the suit schedule property is handed over to the appellant.

¶11The appellant and respondent mutually agree and confirm that there are no subsisting claims, demands, or disputes against each other in respect of the subject matter of the present suit property including rental agreement.

¶12The parties further submit that present compromise has been entered into voluntarily, with free consent, and after fully understanding the terms and conditions herein. There is no coercion, undue influence, or misrepresentation by any party."

¶3In view of the settlement recorded between the parties, memorandum of settlement is accepted. This regular first appeal is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of settlement.

¶4Decree shall be drawn up accordingly.

¶5Eligible Court-fee shall be refunded to the appellant on proper identification by the Registry.

¶6Original documents, i.e. Exs.P2 to P18, shall be returned to appellant, forthwith, on proper identification. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand dismissed as they do not survive for any consideration. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1486 OF 2025 (SP) BETWEEN: SMT. G. ASHWATHAMMA WIFE OF LATE SRI VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT 12/1 NEW BINAMANGALA OLD MADRAS ROAD BENGALURU-560 038. …APPELLANT (BY SRI MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. ANITHA MADHUSHREE N. W/O. SRI S. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT 657 TALUK OFFICE ROAD NEAR KODANDARAMASWAMY TEMPLE BANGARPET TOWN-563 114. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI K. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) * * * Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22-4-2025 PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.103 OF 2020, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., K.G.F., ITINERATE AT BANGARPET, AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) This regular first appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2025 in Original Suit No.103/2020 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, K.G.F., Itinerate at Bangarpet. The appeal was referred to the Mediation Centre for conciliation and a memorandum of settlement has been filed before the Court. 2. Sri Manjunath G. Kandekar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-defendant, and Sri K. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- plaintiff, along with their respective parties are present before the Court. The parties have also affixed their signature to the memorandum of settlement before the Mediation Centre. The terms of settlement are as follows: "1. In Pursuant to the Judgment and Decree dated 22.04.2025 passed in O.S. No.103/2020, respondent/plaintiff being the decree-holder has filed a execution petition in Ex. No.70/2025 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at KGF, and in the said execution petition the Respondent herein has deposited a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) by way of Demand Draft bearing No.544802 dated 24.10.2025, towards the balance sale consideration in compliance with the decree. 2. During the pendency of the present appeal, the parties have amicably settled all their disputes. Under the settlement, the appellant has agreed to pay, and the respondent has agreed to receive, a total sum of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty-Five Lakhs only) towards full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the suit, the decree and the subject matter of the appeal. 3. In view of the settlement, the appellant has paid the settlement amount to the respondent as follows: a) Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) paid by way of cash on 04.03.2026 along the pendency of the mediation. b) Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) paid by way of Demand Draft No.165510 dated 30.05.2026, drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Bengaluru, in favour of respondent; c) Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) paid by way of Demand Draft No.165553 dated 29.06.2026, drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Bengaluru, in favour of respondent; d) Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) paid by way of Demand Draft No.165554 dated 01.07.2026, drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Bengaluru, in favour of respondent; and e) Rs.9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs only) paid by way of Demand Draft No.165559 dated 06.07.2026, drawn on Federal Bank Limited, Bengaluru, in favour of Anitha Madhusri. 4. The respondent hereby acknowledges receipt of the entire settlement amount of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty-Five Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all their claims

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.